Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25293627›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2015

Metabolomic profiling of human serum in lung cancer patients using liquid chromatography/hybrid quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry.

Yingrong Chen, Zhihong Ma, Aiying Li, Hongwei Li, Bin Wang, Jing Zhong, Lishan Min, Licheng Dai

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yingrong ChenHuzhou Key Laboratory of Molecular Medicine, Huzhou Central Hospital, 180 Hongqi Road, Huzhou, 313000, Zhejiang Province, China.
Zhihong Ma
Aiying Li
Hongwei Li
Bin Wang
Jing Zhong
Lishan Min
Licheng Dai
Huzhou Central Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLung cancer is one of the most common causes of death from cancer. Serum markers that enable diagnosis of the disease in the early stage have not been found.

methodsSerum samples were collected from 30 healthy volunteers and from 30 lung cancer patients preoperatively and postoperatively. Samples were subjected to metabolomic analysis using liquid chromatography/hybrid quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Differences in metabolomic profiles among the three groups were characterized by multivariate statistical techniques such as principal components analysis and partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA). An independent t test was used to determine whether levels of biomarker candidates identified using PLS-DA modeling were significantly different among groups at the univariate analysis level (p < 0.05).

resultsBased on pattern recognition results and univariate analysis, we showed that levels of ten potential biomarkers in serum were significantly different in the preoperative lung cancer patients compared with healthy volunteers and/or the postoperative lung cancer patients. The levels of sphingosine, phosphorylcholine, glycerophospho-N-arachidonoyl ethanolamine, γ-linolenic acid, 9,12-octadecadienoic acid, oleic acid, and serine were significantly different in preoperative lung cancer patients compared to healthy volunteers and to postoperative lung cancer patients. For prasterone sulfate, α-hydroxyisobutyric acid, 2,3,4-trihydroxybutyric acid, the levels were statistically different in preoperative and postoperative lung cancer patients compared with the healthy volunteers.

conclusionsOur study identified potential metabolic biomarkers for diagnosis of lung cancer.

Indexed as

AgedBiomarkers, TumorChromatography, High Pressure LiquidGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryHumansLung NeoplasmsMass SpectrometryMetabolomicsMiddle AgedPostoperative PeriodPreoperative PeriodBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID25293627
PMCPMC11823701
OpenAlexW2095583778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.