ArticleTargeted oncology2015
Combination of individualized local control and target-specific agent to improve unresectable liver cancer managements: a matched case-control study.
Article in Targeted oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sorafenib With and Without Transarterial Chemoembolization for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Main Portal Vein Tumor Thrombosis: A Retrospective Analysis.The oncologist · 2015Trial
- The advantages and challenges of sorafenib combination therapy: Drug resistance, toxicity and future directions (Review).Oncology letters · 2025Review
- Development and Validation of a Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A-associated Prognostic Model for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2023Article
- Identification of Potential Predictors of Prognosis and Sorafenib-Associated Survival Benefits in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022Article
- Radiologic Response Combined with Dermatologic Toxicities is the Most Robust Predictor of Survival Benefits in Patients with Inoperable Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Sorafenib Therapy.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2021Article
- The PPRD score stratifies patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and portal vein tumor thrombus treated with sorafenib plus transarterial chemoembolization.European radiology · 2021Article
- Is Salvage Liver Resection Necessary for Initially Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Downstaged by Transarterial Chemoembolization? Ten Years of Experience.The oncologist · 2016Article
- Small flexible structure for targeted delivery of therapeutic and imaging moieties in precision medicine.Oncotarget · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Management of late-stage hepatocellular carcinoma is difficult. A direct comparison of clinical data is needed in order to demonstrate the survival benefits of different therapies. We directly compared various therapies in a retrospective matched case-control study. A total of 79 patients with unresectable tumors greater than 10 cm in size were included in the study between 2008 and 2012. Thirty-five patients were treated with transarterial chemoembolization for local control, 20 were treated with sorafenib systemic chemotherapy, and 24 received combination treatment. The total follow-up time after initial therapy was 4.5 years. Survival time after treatment was significantly longer in the combination therapy group (P < 0.0001). The median survival times for combination, local control, and systemic chemotherapy were 15 (12-21), 10 (9-13), and 3.5 (2.5-9.0) months (95 % confidence interval), respectively. The hazard ratios for local control and systemic chemotherapy were 1.985 and 5.102, respectively, with combination treatment as the reference. There was no observed difference in combination therapy from the side effects of the individual therapies. In conclusion, the limited availability of therapeutic options for late-stage liver cancer necessitates reliance on multidisciplinary personalized medicine approaches with target-specific medications to increase survival time. Combining individualized local control therapy and drugs that target specific disease markers provides more benefits to patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25293575What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.