Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25292428›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of pharmacology and toxicology2015

Therapeutic applications of extracellular vesicles: clinical promise and open questions.

Bence György, Michelle E Hung, Xandra O Breakefield, Joshua N Leonard

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 311 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
311citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

311 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pleiotropic Effects of Exosomes as a Therapy for Stroke Recovery.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Natural Product-Derived Vesicles in Nanotherapeutics.Journal of extracellular vesicles · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Blood-Based Biomarkers for Post-Stroke Cognitive Impairment.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

251 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bence György *Molecular Neurogenetics Unit, Department of Neurology and Center for Molecular Imaging Research, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Program in Neuroscience, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114.
Michelle E Hung *Interdepartmental Biological Sciences Graduate Program, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208.
Xandra O BreakefieldMolecular Neurogenetics Unit, Department of Neurology and Center for Molecular Imaging Research, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Program in Neuroscience, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114.
Joshua N LeonardDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chemistry of Life Processes Institute, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208.

Funding

The role of microvesicles in giloma virotherapyP01CA069246 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI CHAREST, ALAIN · 1996 to 2021
$30.9M
SUPPRESSIVE ROLE OF ANDROGEN RESPONSE GENE CALRETICULIN IN PROSTATE CANCERP50CA090386 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI CRAWFORD, SUSAN · 2001 to 2013
$25.1M
Transfer of microRNA regulators from glioblastoma to brain microenvironment U19CA179563 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BREAKEFIELD, XANDRA OWENS, CHAREST, ALAIN · 2013 to 2017
$8.6M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNCI NIH HHS CA069246NCI NIH HHS P01 CA069246NCI NIH HHS P50 CA090386NCI NIH HHS U19 CA179563
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review provides an updated perspective on rapidly proliferating efforts to harness extracellular vesicles (EVs) for therapeutic applications. We summarize current knowledge, emerging strategies, and open questions pertaining to clinical potential and translation. Potentially useful EVs comprise diverse products of various cell types and species. EV components may also be combined with liposomes and nanoparticles to facilitate manufacturing as well as product safety and evaluation. Potential therapeutic cargoes include RNA, proteins, and drugs. Strategic issues considered herein include choice of therapeutic agent, means of loading cargoes into EVs, promotion of EV stability, tissue targeting, and functional delivery of cargo to recipient cells. Some applications may harness natural EV properties, such as immune modulation, regeneration promotion, and pathogen suppression. These properties can be enhanced or customized to enable a wide range of therapeutic applications, including vaccination, improvement of pregnancy outcome, and treatment of autoimmune disease, cancer, and tissue injury.

Indexed as

Drug CarriersDrug DesignGene Transfer TechniquesAnimalsCell-Derived MicroparticlesChemistry, PharmaceuticalDNAExosomesHumansNanoparticlesNanotechnologyPharmaceutical PreparationsRNATissue DistributionVaccinesDNADrug CarriersPharmaceutical PreparationsRNAVaccinesdrug deliveryexosomesextracellular RNAgene medicinegene therapyliposomesmesenchymal stem cellsmicrovesiclesnanoparticles

Identifiers

PMID25292428
PMCPMC4445965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.