Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25292017›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2015

Is nicotine replacement therapy overvalued in smoking cessation? Analysis of smokers' and quitters' communication in social media.

Terhi Kurko, Kari Linden, Maija Kolstela, Kirsi Pietilä, Marja Airaksinen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. How do people with rheumatoid arthritis experience participation in a smoking cessation trial: a qualitative study.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Terhi KurkoClinical Pharmacy Group, Division of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Kari LindenClinical Pharmacy Group, Division of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Maija KolstelaOrganisation for Respiratory Health in Finland, Helsinki, Finland.
Kirsi PietiläKontula Pharmacy, Helsinki, Finland.
Marja AiraksinenClinical Pharmacy Group, Division of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
University of Helsinki · FIFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare · FIKone (Finland) · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInternet discussion forums provide new, albeit less used data sources for exploring personal experiences of illness and treatment strategies.

objectiveTo gain an understanding of how discussion forum participants value nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) in smoking cessation (SC).

settingFinnish national Internet-based discussion forum, STUMPPI, supporting SC and consisting of ten free discussion areas, each with a different focus. The analysis was based on STUMPPI forum participants' postings (n = 24 481) in five discussion areas during January 2007-January 2012.

designInductive content analysis of the postings concerning NRT use or comparing NRT to other SC methods.

resultsThree major themes related to NRT in SC emerged from the discussions. These were as follows: (I) distrust and negative attitude towards NRT; (II) neutral acceptance of NRT as a useful SC method; and (III) trust on the crucial role of NRT and other SC medicines. The negative attitude was related to following perceptions: NRT use maintains tobacco dependence, fear of NRT dependence or experience of not gaining help from NRT use. NRT was perceived to be useful particularly in the initiation of SC attempts and in dealing with physiological dependence. The most highlighted factors of successful quitting were quitters' own psychological empowerment and peer support from the discussion community.

conclusionsThe majority of STUMPPI forum participants had low or balanced expectations towards the role of NRT in SC. More research from the smokers' and quitters' perspective is needed to assess the real value of NRT compared to other methods in SC.

Indexed as

Tobacco Use Cessation DevicesAdolescentAdultAttitude to HealthCommunicationFinlandHumansPatient Acceptance of Health CareSmokingSmoking CessationSmoking PreventionSocial MediaTrustYoung Adultinternet discussion forumnicotine replacement therapypostingssmoking cessation

Identifiers

PMID25292017
PMCPMC5810674
OpenAlexW2171232683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.