ArticleThe plant pathology journal2013
Take-all of Wheat and Natural Disease Suppression: A Review.
Article in The plant pathology journal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Integrated Management of Sugar-Beet Soilborne Diseases Through Rhizosphere Microbiome Strategies: A Critical Review of Agronomic Evidence and Application Gaps.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- From soil to sequences: mechanisms and tools unravelling plant-rhizomicrobiome interactions.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026Review
- Bacillus seed coating mitigates early growth reduction in successive winter wheat without altering rhizosphere bacterial and archaeal communities.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Synthetic microbial communities for plant growth promotion and soil-borne disease suppression: design principles, mechanisms, and translational challenges.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Alliances and competitions between nematodes and other micro-organisms occurring in the soil biosphere: a review.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Review
- Rapid and sustained differentiation of disease-suppressive phyllosphere microbiomes in tomato following experimental microbiome selection.Environmental microbiome · 2025Article
- Fungicide use intensity influences the soil microbiome and links to fungal disease suppressiveness in amenity turfgrass.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2025Article
- In-depth genome and comparative genome analysis of a metal-resistant environmental isolateFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
- Bioprospecting of multi-stress tolerant Pseudomonas sp. antagonistic to Rhizoctonia solani for enhanced wheat growth promotion.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2025Article
- Microbiome-Mediated Strategies to Manage Major Soil-Borne Diseases of Tomato.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Ecological shifts in soil microbiota and root rot disease progress during ginseng monoculture.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Transition from Ginseng Root Rot Disease-Conducive Soil to -Suppressive Soil Mediated byMicrobiology spectrum · 2023Article
- Character variation of root space microbial community composition in the response of drought-tolerant spring wheat to drought stress.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- 2,4-Diacetylphloroglucinol producing3 Biotech · 2022Article
- Important wheat diseases in the US and their management in the 21st century.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Review
- Characterization of Rhizosphere Microbial Communities for Disease Incidence and Optimized Concentration of Difenoconazole Fungicide for Controlling of Wheat Dwarf Bunt.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- New opportunities in plant microbiome engineering for increasing agricultural sustainability under stressful conditions.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Review
- Dormancy and germination of microsclerotia ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In agro-ecosystems worldwide, some of the most important and devastating diseases are caused by soil-borne necrotrophic fungal pathogens, against which crop plants generally lack genetic resistance. However, plants have evolved approaches to protect themselves against pathogens by stimulating and supporting specific groups of beneficial microorganisms that have the ability to protect either by direct inhibition of the pathogen or by inducing resistance mechanisms in the plant. One of the best examples of protection of plant roots by antagonistic microbes occurs in soils that are suppressive to take-all disease of wheat. Take-all, caused by Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici, is the most economically important root disease of wheat worldwide. Take-all decline (TAD) is the spontaneous decline in incidence and severity of disease after a severe outbreak of take-all during continuous wheat or barley monoculture. TAD occurs worldwide, and in the United States and The Netherlands it results from a build-up of populations of 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol (2,4-DAPG)-producing fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. during wheat monoculture. The antibiotic 2,4-DAPG has a broad spectrum of activity and is especially active against the take-all pathogen. Based on genotype analysis by repetitive sequence-based-PCR analysis and restriction fragment length polymorphism of phlD, a key 2,4-DAPG biosynthesis gene, at least 22 genotypes of 2,4-DAPG producing fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. have been described worldwide. In this review, we provide an overview of G. graminis var. tritici, the take-all disease, Pseudomonas biocontrol agents, and mechanism of disease suppression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.