ReviewBiomedical engineering and computational biology2014
Design strategies of biodegradable scaffolds for tissue regeneration.
Review in Biomedical engineering and computational biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Engineering Functional Cardiac Tissues for Regenerative Medicine Applications.Current cardiology reports · 2019Pooled it
- PVA:ALG Hybrid Bioink for Biofabrication of 3D Neural Models.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Chitosan based smart injectable hydrogels for biomedical applications: A comprehensive review.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- Synthesis and characterization of 3D gelatin/calcium hydroxide/dentin matrix proteins/propolis scaffolds for hard tissue engineering.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- 3D Bioprinted Renal Constructs Using Kidney-Specific ECM Bioink System on Kidney Regeneration.Advanced healthcare materials · 2025Article
- A Facile Strategy for Preparing Flexible and Porous Hydrogel-Based Scaffolds from Silk Sericin/Wool Keratin by In Situ Bubble-Forming for Muscle Tissue Engineering Applications.Macromolecular bioscience · 2025Article
- Characterization of a Delivery System Based on a Hyaluronic Acid 3D Scaffold and Gelatin Microparticles.Polymers · 2024Article
- Design of Chitin Cell Culture Matrices for 3D Tissue Engineering: The Importance of Chitin Types, Solvents, Cross-Linkers, and Fabrication Techniques.Pharmaceutics · 2024Review
- Synthesis and Physicochemical Characterization of Gelatine-Based Biodegradable Aerogel-like Composites as Possible Scaffolds for Regenerative Medicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Article
- Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products for Age-Related Macular Degeneration; Scaffold Fabrication and Delivery Methods.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Graphene-Related Nanomaterials for Biomedical Applications.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Development of Neovasculature in Axially Vascularized Calcium Phosphate Cement Scaffolds.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Article
- Next-Generation Microfluidics for Biomedical Research and Healthcare Applications.Biomedical engineering and computational biology · 2023Review
- Electrospun Poly(lactic acid) and Silk Fibroin Based Nanofibrous Scaffold for Meniscus Tissue Engineering.Polymers · 2022Article
- Polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) Scaffolds for Peripheral Nerve Regeneration: A Systematic Review of Animal Models.Biology · 2022Review
- Bioabsorption of Subcutaneous Nanofibrous Scaffolds Influences the Engraftment and Function of Neonatal Porcine Islets.Polymers · 2022Article
- Jellyfish Collagen: A Biocompatible Collagen Source for 3D Scaffold Fabrication and Enhanced Chondrogenicity.Marine drugs · 2021Article
- Polyelectrolyte Multilayer Capsule (PEMC)-Based Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering.Micromachines · 2020Review
- Hydrogel scaffolds based on blood plasma cryoprecipitate and collagen derived from various sources: Structural, mechanical and biological characteristics.Bioactive materials · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There are numerous available biodegradable materials that can be used as scaffolds in regenerative medicine. Currently, there is a huge emphasis on the designing phase of the scaffolds. Materials can be designed to have different properties in order to match the specific application. Modifying scaffolds enhances their bioactivity and improves the regeneration capacity. Modifications of the scaffolds can be later characterized using several tissue engineering tools. In addition to the material, cell source is an important component of the regeneration process. Modified materials must be able to support survival and growth of different cell types. Together, cells and modified biomaterials contribute to the remodeling of the engineered tissue, which affects its performance. This review focuses on the recent advancements in the designs of the scaffolds including the physical and chemical modifications. The last part of this review also discusses designing processes that involve viability of cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.