Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25288748›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2014

Allopolyploidy, diversification, and the Miocene grassland expansion.

Matt C Estep, Michael R McKain, Dilys Vela Diaz, Jinshun Zhong, John G Hodge, Trevor R Hodkinson, Daniel J Layton, Simon T Malcomber, Rémy Pasquet, Elizabeth A Kellogg

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 75 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed
27.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 232 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A sorghum-anchored pan-grass syntenic gene set in grasses.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Matt C EstepDepartment of Biology, University of Missouri-St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63121; Department of Biology, Appalachian State University, Boone, NC 28608;
Michael R McKainDepartment of Biology, University of Missouri-St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63121; Donald Danforth Plant Science Center, St. Louis, MO 63132;
Dilys Vela DiazDepartment of Biology, University of Missouri-St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63121; Department of Biology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130;
Jinshun ZhongDepartment of Biology, University of Missouri-St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63121; Department of Plant Biology, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405;
John G HodgeDepartment of Biology, University of Missouri-St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63121; Donald Danforth Plant Science Center, St. Louis, MO 63132;
Trevor R HodkinsonDepartment of Botany, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland;
Daniel J LaytonDepartment of Biology, University of Missouri-St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63121; Donald Danforth Plant Science Center, St. Louis, MO 63132;
Simon T MalcomberDivision of Environmental Biology, National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA 22230;
Rémy PasquetInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe), Nairobi, Kenya; Unité de Recherche Institut de Recherche pour le Développement 072, Laboratoire Évolution, Génomes et Spéciation, 91198 Gif-sur-Yvette, France; and Université Paris-Sud 11, 91400 Orsay, France.
Elizabeth A KelloggDepartment of Biology, University of Missouri-St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63121; Donald Danforth Plant Science Center, St. Louis, MO 63132; ekellogg@danforthcenter.org.
University of Missouri–St. Louis · USTrinity College Dublin · IEUniversité Paris-Sud · FRUniversity of Vermont · USU.S. National Science Foundation · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of polyploidy, particularly allopolyploidy, in plant diversification is a subject of debate. Whole-genome duplications precede the origins of many major clades (e.g., angiosperms, Brassicaceae, Poaceae), suggesting that polyploidy drives diversification. However, theoretical arguments and empirical studies suggest that polyploid lineages may actually have lower speciation rates and higher extinction rates than diploid lineages. We focus here on the grass tribe Andropogoneae, an economically and ecologically important group of C4 species with a high frequency of polyploids. A phylogeny was constructed for ca. 10% of the species of the clade, based on sequences of four concatenated low-copy nuclear loci. Genetic allopolyploidy was documented using the characteristic pattern of double-labeled gene trees. At least 32% of the species sampled are the result of genetic allopolyploidy and result from 28 distinct tetraploidy events plus an additional six hexaploidy events. This number is a minimum, and the actual frequency could be considerably higher. The parental genomes of most Andropogoneae polyploids diverged in the Late Miocene coincident with the expansion of the major C4 grasslands that dominate the earth today. The well-documented whole-genome duplication in Zea mays ssp. mays occurred after the divergence of Zea and Sorghum. We find no evidence that polyploidization is followed by an increase in net diversification rate; nonetheless, allopolyploidy itself is a major mode of speciation.

Indexed as

DiploidyGenetic SpeciationGrasslandPolyploidyBayes TheoremBiological EvolutionComputational BiologyGenes, PlantGenomeGenomicsLikelihood FunctionsPhylogenyPoaceaeSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID25288748
PMCPMC4210326
OpenAlexW2062521673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.