ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2015
Determination of culprit coronary artery branches using hemodynamic indices from angiographic images.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cardiovascular imaging 2015 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
A recently reported angiographic technique for hemodynamic indices based on first-pass distribution analysis (FPA) could potentially be helpful for determining the culprit artery responsible for myocardial ischemia. The purpose of this study was to determinate the culprit coronary arterial branches based on coronary flow reserve (CFR) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) using only angiographic images. The study was performed in 14 anesthetized swine. Microspheres were injected into coronary arterial branches to create microvascular disruption. Stenosis was also created by inserting plastic tubings in LAD and LCX arterial branches. Adenosine was used to produce maximum hyperemia. Angiographic CFR (CFRa), relative angiographic CFR (rCFRa), and angiographic FFR (FFRa) were calculated by FPA. The diagnostic abilities of CFRa, rCFRa, and FFRa were compared in three models: (1) epicardial stenosis model (S), (2) microcirculation disruption model (M), and (3) combined(S + M) model by using the area under the ROC curve (AUC). The mean differences between FFRa and the pressure-derived FFR (FFRp) measurements were -0.01 ± 0.21 in S model (N = 37) and 0.01 ± 0.18 in M model (N = 53). From 225 measurements in S model, the AUCs for CFRa and FFRa were 0.720 and 0.918, respectively. From 262 measurements in M model and 238 measurements in (S + M) model, the AUCs for CFRa, rCFRa, FFRa were 0.744, 0.715, 0.959 and 0.806, 0.738, 0.995, respectively. The hemodynamic indices of the small branches (down to ~0.7 mm) could be measured using only angiographic image data. The application of FFRa could potentially provide a useful method to assess the severity of disease in coronary arterial branches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.