Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25288324›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2014

ERβ1: characterization, prognosis, and evaluation of treatment strategies in ERα-positive and -negative breast cancer.

Jordan M Reese, Vera J Suman, Malayannan Subramaniam, Xianglin Wu, Vivian Negron, Anne Gingery, Kevin S Pitel, Sejal S Shah, Heather E Cunliffe, Ann E McCullough and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Jordan M Reese
Vera J Suman
Malayannan Subramaniam
Xianglin Wu
Vivian Negron
Anne Gingery
Kevin S Pitel
Sejal S Shah
Heather E Cunliffe
Ann E McCullough
Barbara A Pockaj
Fergus J Couch
Janet E Olson
Carol Reynolds
Wilma L Lingle
Thomas C Spelsberg
Matthew P Goetz
James N Ingle
John R HawseDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic, 16-01B Guggenheim Building, 200 First St, SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA. hawse.john@mayo.edu.
Mayo Clinic · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USWinnMed · USMayo Clinic in Florida · USUniversity of Otago · NZ

Funding

The Role of CHFR in Tumorigenesis and Paclitaxel-Sensitivity in Breast CancerP50CA116201 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI PETER C LUCAS · 2005 to 2026
$49.9M
Paul Calabresi Program in Clinical/Translational Research at Mayo ClinicK12CA090628 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI WEROHA, SARAVUT · 2001 to 2025
$19.7M
NCI NIH HHS CA90628NCI NIH HHS K12 CA090628NCI NIH HHS P50 CA116201NCI NIH HHS P50CA116201
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe role and clinical value of ERβ1 expression is controversial and recent data demonstrates that many ERβ antibodies are insensitive and/or non-specific. Therefore, we sought to comprehensively characterize ERβ1 expression across all sub-types of breast cancer using a validated antibody and determine the roles of this receptor in mediating response to multiple forms of endocrine therapy both in the presence and absence of ERα expression.

methodsNuclear and cytoplasmic expression patterns of ERβ1 were analyzed in three patient cohorts, including a retrospective analysis of a prospective adjuvant tamoxifen study and a triple negative breast cancer cohort. To investigate the utility of therapeutically targeting ERβ1, we generated multiple ERβ1 expressing cell model systems and determined their proliferative responses following anti-estrogenic or ERβ-specific agonist exposure.

resultsNuclear ERβ1 was shown to be expressed across all major sub-types of breast cancer, including 25% of triple negative breast cancers and 33% of ER-positive tumors, and was associated with significantly improved outcomes in ERα-positive tamoxifen-treated patients. In agreement with these observations, ERβ1 expression sensitized ERα-positive breast cancer cells to the anti-cancer effects of selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs). However, in the absence of ERα expression, ERβ-specific agonists potently inhibited cell proliferation rates while anti-estrogenic therapies were ineffective.

conclusionsUsing a validated antibody, we have confirmed that nuclear ERβ1 expression is commonly present in breast cancer and is prognostic in tamoxifen-treated patients. Using multiple breast cancer cell lines, ERβ appears to be a novel therapeutic target. However, the efficacy of SERMs and ERβ-specific agonists differ as a function of ERα expression.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, MonoclonalBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorCell NucleusCell ProliferationEstrogen AntagonistsEstrogen Receptor alphaEstrogen Receptor betaFemaleHumansMCF-7 CellsMiddle AgedTamoxifenAntibodies, MonoclonalEstrogen AntagonistsEstrogen Receptor alphaEstrogen Receptor betaTamoxifen

Identifiers

PMID25288324
PMCPMC4196114
OpenAlexW1987608812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.