ArticleBMC medicine2014
Standard laboratory tests to identify older adults at increased risk of death.
Article in BMC medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 136 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
136 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The frailty index based on laboratory test data as a tool to investigate the impact of frailty on health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Age and ageing · 2023Pooled it
- Combining modifiable risk factors and risk of dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ open · 2019Pooled it
- Preoperative Frailty Assessment and Outcomes at 6 Months or Later in Older Adults Undergoing Cardiac Surgical Procedures: A Systematic Review.Annals of internal medicine · 2016Pooled it
- Clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation and frailty: insights from the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial.BMC medicine · 2020Trial
- Retrospective Cohort Study on the Association Between a Laboratory Test-Derived Frailty Index and Mortality in Elderly Critically Ill Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease.Health science reports · 2026Article
- How human and animal frailty index studies can inform each other: a brief narrative review.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2026Review
- Laboratory frailty index in pancreaticoduodenectomy: short-term safety and long-term prognosis.Surgery today · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the FI-Lab, a laboratory-based, automated frailty index for acute care: A multicohort study.PLoS medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- Evaluation and Comparison of Latent Health Risk Prediction Models for Clinical Triage: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- The association of frailty with age and lifespan in mice differs by strain and sex.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2026Article
- Association between oral frailty and a laboratory-based frailty index in older adults.European geriatric medicine · 2026Article
- FI-CGA and eFI-CGA in Frailty Care: a Scoping Review.Canadian geriatrics journal : CGJ · 2026Review
- Frailty-related vulnerability and immune cell profiles in younger adults with schizophrenia: an exploratory study.BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
- Development of a laboratory-based frailty index for risk prediction in elderly trauma patients with hip fractures.GeroScience · 2026Article
- Heart Stress, Frailty and Mortality Risk in two prospective cohorts.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Routine laboratory composite indices and geriatric multisyndrome burden: a head to head evaluation against serum albumin.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Frailty as a Key Determinant of Cardiovascular Risk and Mortality in Preserved Ratio Impaired Spirometry: A Nationally Representative Study.The clinical respiratory journal · 2026Article
- FINE, a novel laboratory-based frailty index for elderly patients: a retrospective descriptive study.Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina · 2026Article
- Prognostic value of 48-h reassessment of a laboratory-derived frailty index in ICU patients with sepsis: model development in MIMIC-IV and external transport evaluation.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
76 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOlder adults are at an increased risk of death, but not all people of the same age have the same risk. Many methods identify frail people (that is, those at increased risk) but these often require time-consuming interactions with health care providers. We evaluated whether standard laboratory tests on their own, or added to a clinical frailty index (FI), could improve identification of older adults at increased risk of death.
methodsThis is a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study, where community dwelling and institutionalized participants in the Canadian Study of Health and Aging who also volunteered for blood collection (n = 1,013) were followed for up to six years. A standard FI (FI-CSHA) was constructed from data obtained during the clinical evaluation and a second, novel FI was constructed from laboratory data plus systolic and diastolic blood pressure measurements (FI-LAB). A combined FI included all items from each index. Predictive validity was tested using Cox proportional hazards analysis and discriminative ability by the area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.
resultsOf 1,013 participants, 51.3% had died by six years. The mean baseline value of the FI-LAB was 0.27 (standard deviation 0.11; range 0.05 to 0.63), the FI-CSHA was 0.25 (0.11; 0.02 to 0.72), and the combined FI was 0.26 (0.09; 0.06 to 0.59). In an age- and sex-adjusted model, with each increment in the FI-LAB, the hazard ratios increased by 2.8% (95% confidence interval 1.02 to 1.04). The hazard ratios for the FI-CSHA and the combined FI were 1.02 (1.01 to 1.03) and 1.04 (1.03 to 1.05), respectively. The FI-LAB and FI-CSHA remained independently associated with death in the face of the other. The areas under the ROC curves were 0.72 for FI-LAB, 0.73 for FI-CSHA and 0.74 for the combined FI.
conclusionsAn FI based on routine laboratory data can identify older adults at increased risk of death. Additional evaluation of this approach in clinical settings is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.