Trial reportJAMA pediatrics2014
Prompting asthma intervention in Rochester-uniting parents and providers (PAIR-UP): a randomized trial.
Trial report in JAMA pediatrics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multifaceted Prompting Intervention for Urban Children With Asthma
Promoting Asthma Guidelines and Management Through Technology-Based Intervention and Care Coordination
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Impact of non-drug therapies on asthma control: A systematic review of the literature.The European journal of general practice · 2019Pooled it
- Psychological interventions for parents of children and adolescents with chronic illness.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Effect of the Telemedicine Enhanced Asthma Management-Uniting Providers (TEAM-UP) Program on Asthma Outcomes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.The Journal of pediatrics · 2026Trial
- Facilitators and barriers to the implementation of the Primary Care Asthma Paediatric Pathway: a qualitative analysis.BMJ open · 2022Trial
- Identifying Which Urban Children With Asthma Benefit Most From Clinician Prompting: Subgroup Analyses From the Prompting Asthma Intervention in Rochester-Uniting Parents and Providers (PAIR-UP) Trial.Academic pediatrics · 2018Trial
- Research Accomplishments in Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep: A Retrospective Review.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2023Article
- Validity of asthma disease direction, bother, and risk as self-reported asthma morbidity measures in urban teens.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2020Article
- Validation of Asthma Control Assessment Among Urban Adolescents Using the Asthma Control and Communication Instrument.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2019Article
- Mycoplasma pneumoniae and health outcomes in children with asthma.Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology · 2017Article
- Caregiver education to promote appropriate use of preventive asthma medications: what is happening in primary care?The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma · 2016Article
- Is It Time for a Patient-Centered Quality Measure of Asthma Control?The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practiceReview
- Provider Counseling About Secondhand Smoke Exposure for Urban Children With Persistent or Poorly Controlled Asthma.Journal of pediatric health care : official publication of National Association of Pediatric Nurse Associates & PractitionersArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
importanceA disproportionate number of impoverished and minority children have asthma and receive suboptimal preventive care.
objectiveTo evaluate whether the Prompting Asthma Intervention in Rochester-Uniting Parents and Providers (PAIR-UP) intervention, administered in primary care offices, improves the delivery of preventive care and reduces morbidity for urban children with asthma. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsCluster randomized trial in which 12 urban primary care practices were matched based on size and type and randomly allocated to the PAIR-UP intervention or usual care (UC). We enrolled 638 children aged 2 to 12 years with persistent or poorly controlled asthma in the waiting room prior to a visit with a clinician for any reason from October 2009 to January 2013. Blinded interviewers called caregivers within 2 weeks to inquire about preventive measures taken at the visit and called them 2 and 6 months later to assess symptoms.
interventionsChildren enrolled at PAIR-UP practices received prompts for the caregiver and clinician at the time of the visit that outlined the child's asthma severity or control as well as specific guideline-based recommendations to enhance preventive care. These practices also received educational resources and periodic feedback on their asthma care performance. The UC practices received copies of the asthma guidelines. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was symptom-free days (SFDs) per 2 weeks at the 2-month follow-up.
resultsWe enrolled 638 children (participation rate of 80%; 36% were black, 36% were Hispanic, and 68% had Medicaid insurance). Groups were similar in demographic characteristics and asthma severity at baseline. At the index visit, more children in the PAIR-UP group received a preventive medication action (new medication, increased dose, recommendation to restart preventive medication) than in the UC group (58% vs 33%; odds ratio [OR] = 2.8; 95% CI, 1.9 to 3.9). More children in the PAIR-UP group than in the UC group received an asthma action plan (61% vs 23%; OR = 8.3; 95% CI, 3.7 to 18.7), discussions regarding asthma (93% vs 78%; OR = 4.5; 95% CI, 2.8 to 7.2), and secondhand smoke counseling (80% vs 63%; OR = 2.6; 95% CI, 1.2 to 5.5). At the 2-month follow-up, children in the PAIR-UP group had more SFDs per 2 weeks than those in the UC group (mean difference, 0.78 days; 95% CI, 0.29 to 1.27). At 6 months, the improvement in SFDs was no longer statistically significant (mean difference, 0.56; 95% CI, -0.14 to 1.25). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The PAIR-UP intervention improved the delivery of preventive asthma care and reduced asthma morbidity for high-risk urban children with persistent asthma at 2 months, but the improvement in SFDs was no longer significant at 6 months.
trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01105754.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.