ReviewElectrophoresis2015
Liquid phase based separation systems for depletion, prefractionation, and enrichment of proteins in biological fluids and matrices for in-depth proteomics analysis-An update covering the period 2011-2014.
Review in Electrophoresis, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metabolomic and proteomic stratification of equine osteoarthritis.Equine veterinary journal · 2025Article
- Microfluidics for Peptidomics, Proteomics, and Cell Analysis.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Evaluation of the Molecular Mechanisms of Sepsis Using Proteomics.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Review
- Challenges and Opportunities in Clinical Applications of Blood-Based Proteomics in Cancer.Cancers · 2020Review
- Optimization of Synovial Fluid Collection and Processing for NMR Metabolomics and LC-MS/MS Proteomics.Journal of proteome research · 2020Article
- Polymeric nanoassemblies for enrichment and detection of peptides and proteins in human breast milk.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2020Article
- Characterization of an immobilized enzyme reactor for on-line protein digestion.Journal of chromatography. A · 2016Article
- Extraction, Enrichment, Solubilization, and Digestion Techniques for Membrane Proteomics.Journal of proteome research · 2016Article
- Cardiovascular proteomics in the era of big data: experimental and computational advances.Clinical proteomics · 2016Review
- Comprehensive protein profiling of synovial fluid in osteoarthritis following protein equalization.Osteoarthritis and cartilage · 2015Article
- Sensitive measurement of total protein phosphorylation level in complex protein samples.The Analyst · 2015Article
- The use of biophysical proteomic techniques in advancing our understanding of diseases.Biophysical reviews · 2012Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This review article expands on the previous one (S. Selvaraju and Z. El Rassi, Electrophoresis 2012, 33, 74-88) by reviewing pertinent literature in the period extending from early 2011 to present. As the previous review article, the present one is concerned with proteomic sample preparation (e.g., depletion of high-abundance proteins, reduction of the protein dynamic concentration range, enrichment of a particular subproteome), and the subsequent chromatographic and/or electrophoretic prefractionation prior to peptide separation and identification by LC-MS/MS. This review article, however, is distinguished from its earlier version by expanding on capturing/enriching subphosphoproteomes by immobilized metal affinity chromatography and metal oxide affinity chromatography. Seventy-seven papers published in the period extending from mid-2011 to the present have been reviewed. By no means this review article is exhaustive, given the fact that its aim is to give a concise treatment of the latest developments in the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.