Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25287925›Full record

ArticleInfection and immunity2014

Comparative evaluation of lesion development, tissue damage, and cytokine expression in golden hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus) infected by inocula with different Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis concentrations.

Raquel P Ribeiro-Romão, Otacílio C Moreira, Elvia Yaneth Osorio, Lea Cysne-Finkelstein, Adriano Gomes-Silva, Joanna G Valverde, Claude Pirmez, Alda Maria Da-Cruz, Eduardo Fonseca Pinto

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and immunity, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Therapeutic effect of oral quercetin in hamsters infected withFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A New Target Organ ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Role of FAK signaling in chagasic cardiac hypertrophy.The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Raquel P Ribeiro-RomãoLaboratório Interdisciplinar de Pesquisas Médicas, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ/RJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Otacílio C MoreiraLaboratório de Biologia Molecular e Doenças Endêmicas, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ/RJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Elvia Yaneth OsorioDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA.
Lea Cysne-FinkelsteinLaboratório de Imunoparasitologia, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ/RJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Adriano Gomes-SilvaLaboratório Interdisciplinar de Pesquisas Médicas, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ/RJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Joanna G ValverdeLaboratório Interdisciplinar de Pesquisas Médicas, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ/RJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Claude PirmezLaboratório Interdisciplinar de Pesquisas Médicas, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ/RJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Alda Maria Da-CruzLaboratório Interdisciplinar de Pesquisas Médicas, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ/RJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Eduardo Fonseca PintoLaboratório Interdisciplinar de Pesquisas Médicas, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ/RJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil eduardo@ioc.fiocruz.br.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRThe University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The golden hamster (Mesocricetus auratus) is a susceptible model to Leishmania (Viannia) spp.; however, available studies employ different infection protocols, which account for clinical and pathological presentation differences. Herein, L. (V.) braziliensis preparations were standardized to contain 10(4), 10(5), or 10(6) parasites to determine an optimal inoculum that ensured cutaneous lesions without causing a disseminated infection in hamsters. Lesion development was followed for 105 days by size measurements, and skin, draining lymph node, spleen, and sera were investigated to check parasite load, spleen visceralization, cytokine expression, histopathological changes, and anti-Leishmania IgG levels. The lesion emergence time was inversely proportional to the parasite concentration in the inocula. Animals infected by 10(4) parasites presented nodular lesions, while those infected with 10(6) parasites often exhibited ulcerated lesions. The differences in the final lesion sizes were observed between 10(4) and 10(5) inocula or 10(4) and 10(6) inocula. High IFNG expression, anti-Leishmania IgG levels, and parasite load occurred independently of the inoculum used. A mild inflammatory skin involvement was observed in animals infected with 10(4) parasites, while extensive tissue damage and parasite spleen visceralization occurred with 10(5) and 10(6) parasites. These results indicate that inocula with different concentrations of parasites generate differences in the time of lesion emergence, clinical presentation, and systemic commitment, despite high and similar IFNG expression and parasite load. This suggests that a modulation in the immune response to different parasite numbers occurs in an early phase of the infection, which could dictate the establishment and magnitude of the chronic phase of the disease.

Indexed as

Parasite LoadAnimalsAnimal StructuresAntibodies, ProtozoanCytokinesDisease Models, AnimalFemaleHistocytochemistryImmunoglobulin GLeishmania braziliensisLeishmaniasis, CutaneousLymph NodesMesocricetusSkinSpleenTime FactorsAntibodies, ProtozoanCytokinesImmunoglobulin G

Identifiers

PMID25287925
PMCPMC4249292
OpenAlexW2170316996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.