Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25287435›Full record

Trial reportCancer science2014

Final safety and efficacy of erlotinib in the phase 4 POLARSTAR surveillance study of 10 708 Japanese patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.

Akihiko Gemma, Shoji Kudoh, Masahiko Ando, Yuichiro Ohe, Kazuhiko Nakagawa, Takeshi Johkoh, Naoya Yamazaki, Hiroaki Arakawa, Yoshikazu Inoue, Masahito Ebina and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IV
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer science, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 14 institutions in 1 country.

Akihiko GemmaDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine and Oncology, Nippon Medical School, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Shoji Kudoh
Masahiko Ando
Yuichiro Ohe
Kazuhiko Nakagawa
Takeshi Johkoh
Naoya Yamazaki
Hiroaki Arakawa
Yoshikazu Inoue
Masahito Ebina
Masahiko Kusumoto
Kazuyoshi Kuwano
Fumikazu Sakai
Hiroyuki Taniguchi
Yuh Fukuda
Akihiro Seki
Tadashi Ishii
Masahiro Fukuoka
Tokyo National Hospital · JPDokkyo Medical University · JPIzumi City General Hospital · JPJapan Anti Tuberculosis Association · JPJikei University School of Medicine · JPKindai University · JPKinki Central Hospital · JPMie Chuo Medical Center · JPNagoya University · JPNational Cancer Center Hospital East · JPNational Kinki Chuo Hospital for Chest Disease · JPNippon Medical School · JPSaitama Medical University · JPTosei General Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) occurrence and risk factors were investigated in the Japanese non-small-cell lung cancer, post-marketing, large-scale surveillance study, POLARSTAR. All patients with unresectable, recurrent/advanced non-small-cell lung cancer who were treated with erlotinib in Japan between December 2007 and October 2009 were enrolled. Primary endpoints were patterns of ILD and risk factors for onset of ILD and ILD-related death. Overall survival, progression-free survival, and occurrence of adverse drug reactions were secondary endpoints. Interstitial lung disease was confirmed in 429 (4.3%) patients. Concurrent/previous ILD (hazard ratio, 3.19), emphysema or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (hazard ratio, 1.86), lung infection (hazard ratio, 1.55), smoking history (hazard ratio, 2.23), and period from initial cancer diagnosis to the start of treatment (<360 days; hazard ratio, 0.58) were identified as significant risk factors for developing ILD by Cox multivariate analysis. Logistic regression analysis identified Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 2-4 (odds ratio, 2.45 [95% confidence interval, 1.41-4.27]; P = 0.0016), ≤50% remaining normal lung area (odds ratio, 3.12 [1.48-6.58]; P = 0.0029), and concomitant honeycombing with interstitial pneumonia (odds ratio, 6.67 [1.35-32.94]; P = 0.02) as poor prognostic factors for ILD death. Median overall survival was 277 days; median progression-free survival was 67 days. These data confirm the well-characterized safety profile of erlotinib. Interstitial lung disease is still an adverse drug reaction of interest in this population, and these results, including ILD risk factors, give helpful information for treatment selection and monitoring. Erlotinib efficacy was additionally confirmed in this population. (POLARSTAR trial ML21590.).

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungDisease-Free SurvivalErlotinib HydrochlorideFemaleHumansJapanLung Diseases, InterstitialLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisQuinazolinesAntineoplastic AgentsErlotinib HydrochlorideQuinazolinesErlotinibinterstitial lung diseaseJapanesenon-small-cell lung cancersurveillance

Identifiers

PMID25287435
PMCPMC4317960
OpenAlexW2147325425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.