Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25287324›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2014

A prospective study of marijuana use change and cessation among adolescents.

Michael S Pollard, Joan S Tucker, Kayla de la Haye, Harold D Green, David P Kennedy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael S PollardRAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, P.O. Box 3128, Santa Monica, CA, 90407-2138, United States. Electronic address: mpollard@rand.org.
Joan S TuckerRAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, P.O. Box 3128, Santa Monica, CA, 90407-2138, United States.
Kayla de la HayeKeck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 2001N. Soto Street, Los Angeles, CA, 90089-9239, United States.
Harold D GreenRAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, P.O. Box 3128, Santa Monica, CA, 90407-2138, United States.
David P KennedyRAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, P.O. Box 3128, Santa Monica, CA, 90407-2138, United States.
RAND Corporation · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

Wave IV Data CollectionP01HD031921 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HARRIS, KATHLEEN MULLAN · 1994 to 2020
$86.1M
The Role of Peer Networks in Youth Drug UseR01DA030380 · NIDA · RAND CORPORATION · PI TUCKER, JOAN S · 2010 to 2012
$762k
NICHD NIH HHS P01 HD031921NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA030380NIDA NIH HHS R01DA030380
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith marijuana use increasing among American adolescents, better understanding of the factors associated with decreasing use and quitting can help inform cessation efforts. This study evaluates a range of neighborhood, family, peer network, and individual factors as predictors of marijuana use, change, and non-use over one year, and cessation over six years.

methodsData come from adolescents in Waves I and II of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (N=458, one-year sample), or Waves I and III (N=358, six-year sample), and reported using marijuana at least four times in the past month at Wave I.

resultsEighteen percent of adolescents stopped using marijuana after six years. Results suggest neighborhood context affects overall use level, whereas neighborhood context and friends were critical to cessation vs. continuation of use. Decrease in use were more likely among adolescents in disadvantaged or less cohesive neighborhoods, or who moved between waves. Non-use after one year was more likely among adolescents who did not move, had fewer marijuana-using friends, and did not exclusively have outside-of-school friends. Cessation at six years was more likely among adolescents in less disadvantaged and more cohesive neighborhoods, and for those with within-school friends.

conclusionsResults highlight the importance of both objective and subjective neighborhood characteristics, as well as peer networks, on adolescent marijuana use. Factors associated with decreases in use appear distinct from those that predict quitting, suggesting that continuation vs. cessation is linked to peers as well as neighborhood context. Relocated and isolated individuals may face challenges with cessation.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdolescent BehaviorFemaleFriendsHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMarijuana SmokingPeer GroupProspective StudiesResidence CharacteristicsSchoolsAdolescentCessationFamilyMarijuanaNeighborhoodPeer

Identifiers

PMID25287324
PMCPMC4252517
OpenAlexW1982718025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.