Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25287258›Full record

ReviewCurrent urology reports2014

Mixed incontinence: what takes precedence in its management?

Eugene W Lee, Kathleen C Kobashi

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current urology reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05700487 (THE EFFECT OF PELVIC FLOOR EXERCISES ON URINARY INCONTINENCE AND QUALITY OF LIFE AFTER PROSTATECTOMY), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05700487 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

The effect of pelvic floor exercises on urinary incontinence and quality of life after prostatectomy

TypeinterventionalSponsorTC Erciyes UniversityRan2019 to 2021Enrolled33ConditionsPROSTATECTOMY, URINARY INCONTINENCEArmsPELVIC FLOOR EXERCISES
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. The management of mixed urinary incontinence in women.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Eugene W LeeVirginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA, Eugene.Lee@virginiamason.org.
Kathleen C Kobashi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mixed urinary incontinence is a commonly encountered condition for urologists, urogynecologists, and primary care providers. In this review, we discuss the approach to the evaluation and management of patients with simultaneous stress and urgency urinary incontinence. The available evidence for treatment modalities in the setting of mixed urinary incontinence is presented, and we discuss our treatment algorithm for this common but challenging clinical scenario. An accurate assessment of stress and urge symptoms and their relative impact on quality of life help guide the management plan, appropriate counseling, and appropriate appraisal of patient expectations for treatment.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsHumansUrinary Incontinence, StressUrinary Incontinence, Urge

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.