Trial reportBMJ open2014
The Esophageal Pressure-Guided Ventilation 2 (EPVent2) trial protocol: a multicentre, randomised clinical trial of mechanical ventilation guided by transpulmonary pressure.
Trial report in BMJ open, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
EPVent 2- A Phase II Study of Mechanical Ventilation Directed by Transpulmonary Pressures (EPVent2)
Effect of Position and Pneumoperitoneum on Respiratory Mechanics and Transpulmonary Pressure During Laparoscopic Surgery
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transpulmonary Pressure as a Predictor of Successful Lung Recruitment: Reanalysis of a Multicenter International Randomized Clinical Trial.Respiratory care · 2025Trial
- Effect of Esophageal Pressure-guided Positive End-Expiratory Pressure on Survival from Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Risk-based and Mechanistic Reanalysis of the EPVent-2 Trial.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2021Trial
- Alive and Ventilator Free: A Hierarchical, Composite Outcome for Clinical Trials in the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.Critical care medicine · 2020Trial
- Trial
- High Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Is Associated with Improved Survival in Obese Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.The American journal of medicine · 2017Trial
- Impact of extended lung protection during mechanical ventilation on lung recovery in patients with COVID-19 ARDS: a phase II randomized controlled trial.Annals of intensive care · 2024Article
- Optimal Upper Limits of Plateau Pressure for Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome During the First Seven Days: A Meta-Regression Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine research · 2021Article
- Monitoring Patient Respiratory Effort During Mechanical Ventilation: Lung and Diaphragm-Protective Ventilation.Critical care (London, England) · 2020Review
- Clinical trials and future directions in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome.Annals of translational medicine · 2019Review
- Management Strategies for Severe and Refractory Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Where Do We Stand in 2018?Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia · 2019Review
- Ventilation in patients with intra-abdominal hypertension: what every critical care physician needs to know.Annals of intensive care · 2019Review
- Should we titrate positive end-expiratory pressure based on an end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure?Annals of translational medicine · 2018Article
- Should we titrate peep based on end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure?-yes.Annals of translational medicine · 2018Article
- Effects of positive end-expiratory pressure strategy in supine and prone position on lung and chest wall mechanics in acute respiratory distress syndrome.Annals of intensive care · 2018Article
- Esophageal pressure: research or clinical tool?Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2018Review
- Personalizing mechanical ventilation according to physiologic parameters to stabilize alveoli and minimize ventilator induced lung injury (VILI).Intensive care medicine experimental · 2017Review
- A fixed correction of absolute transpulmonary pressure may not be ideal for clinical use : Discussion on "Accuracy of esophageal pressure to assess transpulmonary pressure during mechanical ventilation".Intensive care medicine · 2017Article
- Intensive alveolar recruitment strategy in the post-cardiac surgery setting: one PEEP level may not fit all.Journal of thoracic disease · 2017Article
- Transpulmonary pressure: importance and limits.Annals of translational medicine · 2017Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
introductionOptimal ventilator management for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains uncertain. Lower tidal volume ventilation appears to be beneficial, but optimal management of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) remains unclear. The Esophageal Pressure-Guided Ventilation 2 Trial (EPVent2) aims to examine the impact of mechanical ventilation directed at maintaining a positive transpulmonary pressure (PTP) in patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: EPVent2 is a multicentre, prospective, randomised, phase II clinical trial testing the hypothesis that the use of a PTP-guided ventilation strategy will lead to improvement in composite outcomes of mortality and time off the ventilator at 28 days as compared with a high-PEEP control. This study will enrol 200 study participants from 11 hospitals across North America. The trial will utilise a primary composite end point that incorporates death and days off the ventilator at 28 days to test the primary hypothesis that adjusting ventilator pressure to achieve positive PTP values will result in improved mortality and ventilator-free days. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Safety oversight will be under the direction of an independent Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB). Approval of the protocol was obtained from the DSMB prior to enrolling the first study participant. Approvals of the protocol as well as informed consent documents were also obtained from the Institutional Review Board of each participating institution prior to enrolling study participants at each respective site. The findings of this investigation, as well as associated ancillary studies, will be disseminated in the form of oral and abstract presentations at major national and international medical specialty meetings. The primary objective and other significant findings will also be presented in manuscript form. All final, published manuscripts resulting from this protocol will be submitted to PubMed Central in accordance with the National Institute of Health Public Access Policy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov under number NCT01681225.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.