Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25287075›Full record

Trial reportNeuroradiology2015

Observer reliability of CT angiography in the assessment of acute ischaemic stroke: data from the Third International Stroke Trial.

Grant Mair, Rüdiger von Kummer, Alessandro Adami, Philip M White, Matthew E Adams, Bernard Yan, Andrew M Demchuk, Andrew J Farrall, Robin J Sellar, Rajesh Ramaswamy and 13 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neuroradiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Accuracy of artificial intelligence software for CT angiography in stroke.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Grant MairDivision of Neuroimaging Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK.
Rüdiger von Kummer
Alessandro Adami
Philip M White
Matthew E Adams
Bernard Yan
Andrew M Demchuk
Andrew J Farrall
Robin J Sellar
Rajesh Ramaswamy
Daisy Mollison
Elena V Boyd
Mark A Rodrigues
Karim Samji
Andrew J Baird
Geoff Cohen
Eleni Sakka
Jeb Palmer
David Perry
Richard Lindley
Peter A G Sandercock
Joanna M Wardlaw
IST-3 Collaborative Group
Western General Hospital · GBEdinburgh Royal Infirmary · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GBNational Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery · GBNorthwick Park Hospital · GBOspedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria · ITThe George Institute for Global Health · AUThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AU

Funding

Medical Research Council G0400069Medical Research Council MC_G1002455
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCT angiography (CTA) is often used for assessing patients with acute ischaemic stroke. Only limited observer reliability data exist. We tested inter- and intra-observer reliability for the assessment of CTA in acute ischaemic stroke.

methodsWe selected 15 cases from the Third International Stroke Trial (IST-3, ISRCTN25765518) with various degrees of arterial obstruction in different intracranial locations on CTA. To assess inter-observer reliability, seven members of the IST-3 expert image reading panel (>5 years experience reading CTA) and seven radiology trainees (<2 years experience) rated all 15 scans independently and blind to clinical data for: presence (versus absence) of any intracranial arterial abnormality (stenosis or occlusion), severity of arterial abnormality using relevant scales (IST-3 angiography score, Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) score, Clot Burden Score), collateral supply and visibility of a perfusion defect on CTA source images (CTA-SI). Intra-observer reliability was assessed using independently repeated expert panel scan ratings. We assessed observer agreement with Krippendorff's-alpha (K-alpha).

resultsAmong experienced observers, inter-observer agreement was substantial for the identification of any angiographic abnormality (K-alpha = 0.70) and with an angiography assessment scale (K-alpha = 0.60-0.66). There was less agreement for grades of collateral supply (K-alpha = 0.56) or for identification of a perfusion defect on CTA-SI (K-alpha = 0.32). Radiology trainees performed as well as expert readers when additional training was undertaken (neuroradiology specialist trainees). Intra-observer agreement among experts provided similar results (K-alpha = 0.33-0.72).

conclusionFor most imaging characteristics assessed, CTA has moderate to substantial observer agreement in acute ischaemic stroke. Experienced readers and those with specialist training perform best.

Indexed as

Cerebral AngiographyTomography, X-Ray ComputedAcute DiseaseBrain IschemiaClinical CompetenceHumansObserver VariationProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsStrokeThrombolytic Therapy

Identifiers

PMID25287075
PMCPMC4295028
OpenAlexW2151499628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.