Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25286854›Full record

ArticleActa crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography2014

Using textons to rank crystallization droplets by the likely presence of crystals.

Jia Tsing Ng, Carien Dekker, Markus Kroemer, Michael Osborne, Frank von Delft

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Journal of structural biology: X · 2020
    Article
  12. Iterative screen optimization maximizes the efficiency of macromolecular crystallization.Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications · 2019
    Article
  13. Cinder: keeping crystallographers app-y.Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications · 2018
    Article
  14. Gentle, fast and effective crystal soaking by acoustic dispensing.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2017
    Article
  15. Lessons from ten years of crystallization experiments at the SGC.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2016
    Article
  16. Protein Crystallography in Vaccine Research and Development.International journal of molecular sciences · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jia Tsing NgStructural Genomics Consortium, University of Oxford, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford OX3 7DQ, England.
Carien DekkerNovartis Institute for Biomedical Research, Novartis Campus, Postfach, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland.
Markus KroemerNovartis Institute for Biomedical Research, Novartis Campus, Postfach, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland.
Michael OsborneDepartment of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PJ, England.
Frank von DelftStructural Genomics Consortium, University of Oxford, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford OX3 7DQ, England.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 092809Wellcome Trust 092809/Z/10/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The visual inspection of crystallization experiments is an important yet time-consuming and subjective step in X-ray crystallography. Previously published studies have focused on automatically classifying crystallization droplets into distinct but ultimately arbitrary experiment outcomes; here, a method is described that instead ranks droplets by their likelihood of containing crystals or microcrystals, thereby prioritizing for visual inspection those images that are most likely to contain useful information. The use of textons is introduced to describe crystallization droplets objectively, allowing them to be scored with the posterior probability of a random forest classifier trained against droplets manually annotated for the presence or absence of crystals or microcrystals. Unlike multi-class classification, this two-class system lends itself naturally to unidirectional ranking, which is most useful for assisting sequential viewing because images can be arranged simply by using these scores: this places droplets with probable crystalline behaviour early in the viewing order. Using this approach, the top ten wells included at least one human-annotated crystal or microcrystal for 94% of the plates in a data set of 196 plates imaged with a Minstrel HT system. The algorithm is robustly transferable to at least one other imaging system: when the parameters trained from Minstrel HT images are applied to a data set imaged by the Rock Imager system, human-annotated crystals ranked in the top ten wells for 90% of the plates. Because rearranging images is fundamental to the approach, a custom viewer was written to seamlessly support such ranked viewing, along with another important output of the algorithm, namely the shape of the curve of scores, which is itself a useful overview of the behaviour of the plate; additional features with known usefulness were adopted from existing viewers. Evidence is presented that such ranked viewing of images allows faster but more accurate evaluation of drops, in particular for the identification of microcrystals.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCrystallizationCrystallography, X-RayImage Processing, Computer-AssistedProteinsReproducibility of ResultsProteinscrystallizationidentification of crystalstextons

Identifiers

PMID25286854
PMCPMC4188010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.