ArticleActa crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography2014
Using textons to rank crystallization droplets by the likely presence of crystals.
Article in Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- A resource-efficient structure-based workflow for fragment progression enables parallel hit discovery and validation of functionally diverse modulators of NCS-1 protein-protein interactions.Chemical science · 2026Article
- Workflow for Crystallographic Fragment Screening by Crystal Soaking for Protein Targets: A Case Study on Thioredoxin Glutathione Reductase FromBio-protocol · 2026Article
- Enhanced identification of small molecules binding to hnRNPA1 via cryptic pockets mapping coupled with X-Ray fragment screening.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- CHiMP: deep-learning tools trained on protein crystallization micrographs to enable automation of experiments.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2024Article
- Crystal search - feasibility study of a real-time deep learning process for crystallization well images.Acta crystallographica. Section A, Foundations and advances · 2023Article
- Structural Analysis and Development of Notum Fragment Screening Hits.ACS chemical neuroscience · 2022Article
- SAMPL7 protein-ligand challenge: A community-wide evaluation of computational methods against fragment screening and pose-prediction.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2022Article
- IceBear: an intuitive and versatile web application for research-data tracking from crystallization experiment to PDB deposition.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2021Article
- The low-cost Shifter microscope stage transforms the speed and robustness of protein crystal harvesting.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2021Article
- Structural characterization of melatonin as an inhibitor of the Wnt deacylase Notum.Journal of pineal research · 2020Article
- Article
- Iterative screen optimization maximizes the efficiency of macromolecular crystallization.Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications · 2019Article
- Cinder: keeping crystallographers app-y.Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications · 2018Article
- Gentle, fast and effective crystal soaking by acoustic dispensing.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2017Article
- Lessons from ten years of crystallization experiments at the SGC.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2016Article
- Protein Crystallography in Vaccine Research and Development.International journal of molecular sciences · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The visual inspection of crystallization experiments is an important yet time-consuming and subjective step in X-ray crystallography. Previously published studies have focused on automatically classifying crystallization droplets into distinct but ultimately arbitrary experiment outcomes; here, a method is described that instead ranks droplets by their likelihood of containing crystals or microcrystals, thereby prioritizing for visual inspection those images that are most likely to contain useful information. The use of textons is introduced to describe crystallization droplets objectively, allowing them to be scored with the posterior probability of a random forest classifier trained against droplets manually annotated for the presence or absence of crystals or microcrystals. Unlike multi-class classification, this two-class system lends itself naturally to unidirectional ranking, which is most useful for assisting sequential viewing because images can be arranged simply by using these scores: this places droplets with probable crystalline behaviour early in the viewing order. Using this approach, the top ten wells included at least one human-annotated crystal or microcrystal for 94% of the plates in a data set of 196 plates imaged with a Minstrel HT system. The algorithm is robustly transferable to at least one other imaging system: when the parameters trained from Minstrel HT images are applied to a data set imaged by the Rock Imager system, human-annotated crystals ranked in the top ten wells for 90% of the plates. Because rearranging images is fundamental to the approach, a custom viewer was written to seamlessly support such ranked viewing, along with another important output of the algorithm, namely the shape of the curve of scores, which is itself a useful overview of the behaviour of the plate; additional features with known usefulness were adopted from existing viewers. Evidence is presented that such ranked viewing of images allows faster but more accurate evaluation of drops, in particular for the identification of microcrystals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.