Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25286837›Full record

ArticleActa crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography2014

Operation of the Australian Store.Synchrotron for macromolecular crystallography.

Grischa R Meyer, David Aragão, Nathan J Mudie, Tom T Caradoc-Davies, Sheena McGowan, Philip J Bertling, David Groenewegen, Stevan M Quenette, Charles S Bond, Ashley M Buckle and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Structures of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isoprenyl diphosphate synthase Rv2173 in substrate-bound forms.Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications · 2025
    Article
  2. Making your raw data available to the macromolecular crystallography community.Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications · 2023
    Article
  3. Review
  4. IUCrData · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Sharing Big Data.IUCrJ · 2017
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Databases, Repositories, and Other Data Resources in Structural Biology.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2017
    Review
  11. A public database of macromolecular diffraction experiments.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2016
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Safeguarding Structural Data Repositories against Bad Apples.Structure (London, England : 1993) · 2016
    Review
  14. MicroED data collection and processing.Acta crystallographica. Section A, Foundations and advances · 2015
    Article
  15. Article
  16. How to make deposition of images a reality.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography · 2014
    Article
  17. Archiving raw crystallographic data.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Grischa R MeyerMonash eResearch Centre, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia.
David AragãoMacromolecular Crystallography, Australian Synchrotron, 800 Blackburn Road, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia.
Nathan J MudieMacromolecular Crystallography, Australian Synchrotron, 800 Blackburn Road, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia.
Tom T Caradoc-DaviesMacromolecular Crystallography, Australian Synchrotron, 800 Blackburn Road, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia.
Sheena McGowanDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia.
Philip J BertlingLibrary, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia.
David GroenewegenLibrary, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia.
Stevan M QuenetteMonash eResearch Centre, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia.
Charles S BondSchool of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley 6009, Western Australia, Australia.
Ashley M BuckleDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia.
Steve AndroulakisMonash Bioinformatics Platform, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Store.Synchrotron service, a fully functional, cloud computing-based solution to raw X-ray data archiving and dissemination at the Australian Synchrotron, is described. The service automatically receives and archives raw diffraction data, related metadata and preliminary results of automated data-processing workflows. Data are able to be shared with collaborators and opened to the public. In the nine months since its deployment in August 2013, the service has handled over 22.4 TB of raw data (∼1.7 million diffraction images). Several real examples from the Australian crystallographic community are described that illustrate the advantages of the approach, which include real-time online data access and fully redundant, secure storage. Discoveries in biological sciences increasingly require multidisciplinary approaches. With this in mind, Store.Synchrotron has been developed as a component within a greater service that can combine data from other instruments at the Australian Synchrotron, as well as instruments at the Australian neutron source ANSTO. It is therefore envisaged that this will serve as a model implementation of raw data archiving and dissemination within the structural biology research community.

Indexed as

Crystallography, X-RayAustraliaData CurationSynchrotronsWorkflowAustralian Store.Synchrotrondata archiving

Identifiers

PMID25286837
PMCPMC4187999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.