ArticleActa crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography2014
Archiving raw crystallographic data.
Article in Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- The evolution of raw data archiving and the growth of its importance in crystallography.IUCrJ · 2024Article
- Making your raw data available to the macromolecular crystallography community.Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications · 2023Article
- The four Rs and crystal structure analysis: reliability, reproducibility, replicability and reusability.Journal of applied crystallography · 2022Article
- Findable Accessible Interoperable Re-usable (FAIR) diffraction data are coming to protein crystallography.Journal of applied crystallography · 2019Article
- Findable Accessible Interoperable Re-usable (FAIR) diffraction data are coming to protein crystallography.Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications · 2019Article
- Findable Accessible Interoperable Re-usable (FAIR) diffraction data are coming to protein crystallography.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2019Article
- Findable Accessible Interoperable Re-usable (FAIR) diffraction data are coming to protein crystallography.IUCrJ · 2019Article
- Never too late for endothelin.Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications · 2019Article
- The science is in the data.IUCrJ · 2017Review
- Extension of research data repository system to support direct compute access to biomedical datasets: enhancing Dataverse to support large datasets.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2017Review
- Raw diffraction data preservation and reuse: overview, update on practicalities and metadata requirements.IUCrJ · 2017Review
- Databases, Repositories, and Other Data Resources in Structural Biology.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2017Review
- Article
- A public database of macromolecular diffraction experiments.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2016Article
- Progress in protein crystallography.Protein and peptide letters · 2016Article
- Assessing and maximizing data quality in macromolecular crystallography.Current opinion in structural biology · 2015Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
This article describes some of the activities of the IUCr Diffraction Data Deposition Working Group and introduces a collection of articles discussing the archiving of diffraction images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.