Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25286440›Full record

ArticleGastroenterology2015

Ablation of Foxl1-Cre-labeled hepatic progenitor cells and their descendants impairs recovery of mice from liver injury.

Soona Shin, Naman Upadhyay, Linda E Greenbaum, Klaus H Kaestner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gastroenterology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Development of a hepatic cryoinjury model to study liver regeneration.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Distinct hepatocyte identities in liver homeostasis and regeneration.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2023
    Review
  11. [Research progress in lineage tracing to explore hepatic parenchymal cell regeneration and repair mechanisms].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Update on Hepatobiliary Plasticity.Seminars in liver disease · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Repolarization Precedes Oval Cell-mediated Hepatocytic Regeneration in the CDE Diet Mouse Model.The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society · 2022
    Article
  16. Cellular origins of regenerating liver and hepatocellular carcinoma.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2022
    Review
  17. Role of Immune Cells in Biliary Repair.Frontiers in immunology · 2022
    Review
  18. Recent advances in tissue stem cells.Science China. Life sciences · 2021
    Review
  19. Cell-Based Regeneration and Treatment of Liver Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Soona ShinDepartment of Genetics and Center for Molecular Studies in Digestive and Liver Diseases, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Naman UpadhyayDepartment of Genetics and Center for Molecular Studies in Digestive and Liver Diseases, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Linda E GreenbaumDepartments of Cancer Biology and Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Klaus H KaestnerDepartment of Genetics and Center for Molecular Studies in Digestive and Liver Diseases, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: kaestner@mail.med.upenn.edu.
University of Pennsylvania · USThomas Jefferson University · US

Funding

VIRAL VECTOR COREP30DK019525 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MITCHELL A. LAZAR · 1986 to 2026
$48.3M
TRANSGENIC AND CHIMERIC MOUSE COREP30DK050306 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Ken Hashigiwa Cadwell · 1997 to 2026
$32.5M
ZINC FINGER PROTEINS IN EARLY KIDNEY DEVELOPMENTP01DK049210 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI AHIMA, REXFORD S. · 1995 to 2016
$26.9M
REGULATORY CASCADES IN GASTROINTESTINAL PROLIFERATIONR01DK053839 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI KAESTNER, KLAUS H · 1998 to 2011
$4.5M
Innovative Genetic Approaches for Hepatic RepopulationR01DK102667 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI KAESTNER, KLAUS H · 2015 to 2019
$1.8M
NIDDK NIH HHS P01 DK049210NIDDK NIH HHS P01-DK049210NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK019525NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK050306NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK053839NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK102667
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

aimsFoxl1(+) hepatic progenitor cells (HPCs) differentiate into cholangiocytes and hepatocytes after liver injury. We investigated the requirement for Foxl1(+) HPCs in recovery from liver injury in mice.

methodsWe developed mice in which we could trace and delete Foxl1-expressing HPCs and their descendants (Foxl1-Cre;Rosa(YFP/iDTR)-inducible diphtheria toxin receptor [iDTR] mice). Foxl1-Cre-negative mice were used as controls. Liver damage was induced in male mice by placing them on choline-deficient, ethionine-supplemented (CDE) diets for 15 days; mice then were placed on normal diets and allowed to recover. Liver damage was induced in female mice by placing them on 3,5-diethoxycarbonyl-1,4-dihydrocollidine (DDC)-containing diets, followed by a recovery period. Some mice were given injections of diphtheria toxin during the recovery phase to delete Foxl1-Cre-marked HPCs and their descendants. Livers were collected from all mice and analyzed by immunofluorescence, quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction, flow cytometry, and histologic analyses.

resultsFoxl1-Cre-marked HPCs were required for the development of cholangiocytes and hepatocytes in livers after CDE diet-induced injury. A smaller percentage of yellow fluorescent protein-positive (YFP(+)) hepatocytes contained markers of oxidative stress, DNA damage, or cell death than YFP-negative hepatocytes, indicating that YFP(+) hepatocytes are newly formed cells. Injection of diphtheria toxin deleted YFP(+) cells from Foxl1-Cre;Rosa(YFP/iDTR) mice and prevented the resolution of hepatic steatosis. In mice recovering from DDC diet-induced injury, most cholangiocytes arose from Foxl1-Cre-marked HPCs. Deletion of YFP(+) cells did not alter levels of markers of liver injury or liver function.

conclusionsBased on studies of Foxl1-Cre;Rosa(YFP/iDTR) mice, Foxl1(+) HPCs and/or their descendants are required for the development of cholangiocytes and hepatocytes in liver after CDE diet-induced injury.

Indexed as

Cell LineageCell ProliferationLiver RegenerationAnimalsBacterial ProteinsBile Ducts, IntrahepaticCell DeathChemical and Drug Induced Liver InjuryCholine DeficiencyDisease Models, AnimalDNA DamageEthionineFemaleForkhead Transcription FactorsHeparin-binding EGF-like Growth FactorHepatocytes3,5-diethoxycarbonyl-1,4-dihydrocollidineBacterial ProteinsCre recombinaseEthionineForkhead Transcription FactorsFoxl1 protein, mouseGt(ROSA)26Sor non-coding RNA, mouseHeparin-binding EGF-like Growth FactorIntegrasesLuminescent ProteinsPyridinesRNA, Untranslatedyellow fluorescent protein, BacteriaHPCsMouse ModelNonalcoholic Fatty Liver DiseaseOval Cells

Identifiers

PMID25286440
PMCPMC4387775
OpenAlexW2123625141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.