Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25286406›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Low-level carotid baroreceptor stimulation suppresses ventricular arrhythmias during acute ischemia.

Kai Liao, Lilei Yu, Kang Yang, Gaowa Saren, Songyun Wang, Bing Huang, Hong Jiang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Autonomic modulation of ventricular electrical activity: recent developments and clinical implications.Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2021
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Update on prevention and treatment of sudden cardiac arrest.Trends in cardiovascular medicine · 2019
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Cardioprotective effects of low-level carotid baroreceptor stimulation against myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury in canine model.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2016
    Article
  11. Effects of low-level carotid baroreflex stimulation on atrial electrophysiology.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2015
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kai LiaoDepartment of Cardiology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Lilei YuDepartment of Cardiology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Kang YangDepartment of Cardiology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Gaowa SarenDepartment of Cardiology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Songyun WangDepartment of Cardiology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Bing HuangDepartment of Cardiology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Hong JiangDepartment of Cardiology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Wuhan University · CNRenmin Hospital of Wuhan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe autonomic imbalance during acute ischemia is involved in the occurrence of life-threatening arrhythmias.

objectiveTo investigate the effect of autonomic nervous system (ANS) modulation by low-level carotid baroreceptor stimulation (LL-CBS) on ventricular ischemia arrhythmias.

methodsAnesthetized dogs were received either sham treatment (SHAM group, n = 10) or LL-CBS treatment (LL-CBS group, n = 10). The voltage lowering the blood pressure was used as the threshold for setting LL-CBS at 80% below the threshold. Treatment started 1 hour before left anterior descending coronary (LAD) occlusion, and continued until the end of experience. Ventricular effective refractory periods (ERP), monophasic action potential duration at 90% (APD90), ventricular arrhythmias, indices of heart rate variability, left stellate ganglion nerve activity (LSGNA) and infarct sizes were measured and analyzed.

resultsVentricular ischemia resulted in an acute reduction of blood pressure, which was not significantly affected by LL-CBS. After 1 hour of LL-CBS, there was a progressive and significant increase in ERP, increase in APD90, and decrease in LSGNA vs the SHAM group (all P<0.05). LL-CBS apparently reduced premature ventricular contractions (PVC, 264±165 in the SHAM group vs 60±37 in the LL-CBS group; P<0.01) during LAD occlusion. Number of episodes of ventricular fibrillation (VF) was 8 in the Control group versus 3 in the LL-CBS group (80% versus 30%, P<0.05). LL-CBS obviously increased high frequency (HF) component (P<0.05) and decreased low frequency/high frequency ratio (P<0.05) compared with the SHAM group. Ischemic size was not affected by LL-CBS between the two groups.

conclusionsLL-CBS reduced the occurrences of ventricular arrhythmias during acute ischemia without affecting blood pressure. The procedure was associated with changes of electrophysiological characteristics, nerve activity and heart rate variability. Therefore, LL-CBS may protect from ventricular arrhythmias during acute ischemic events by modulating ANS.

Indexed as

Electric StimulationAction PotentialsAcute DiseaseAnimalsArrhythmias, CardiacCarotid ArteriesCoronary OcclusionDogsEvoked PotentialsHeart VentriclesHemodynamicsMaleMyocardial IschemiaPressoreceptorsStellate Ganglion

Identifiers

PMID25286406
PMCPMC4186866
OpenAlexW2080819520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.