Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25286161›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

The interrelationship between promoter strength, gene expression, and growth rate.

Matthew S Bienick, Katherine W Young, Justin R Klesmith, Emily E Detwiler, Kyle J Tomek, Timothy A Whitehead

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Vibrio natriegens: Application of a Fast-Growing Halophilic Bacterium.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Matthew S BienickDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.
Katherine W YoungDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America; High School Honors Science/Mathematics/Engineering Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.
Justin R KlesmithDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.
Emily E DetwilerDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.
Kyle J TomekDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.
Timothy A WhiteheadDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America; Department of Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In exponentially growing bacteria, expression of heterologous protein impedes cellular growth rates. Quantitative understanding of the relationship between expression and growth rate will advance our ability to forward engineer bacteria, important for metabolic engineering and synthetic biology applications. Recently, a work described a scaling model based on optimal allocation of ribosomes for protein translation. This model quantitatively predicts a linear relationship between microbial growth rate and heterologous protein expression with no free parameters. With the aim of validating this model, we have rigorously quantified the fitness cost of gene expression by using a library of synthetic constitutive promoters to drive expression of two separate proteins (eGFP and amiE) in E. coli in different strains and growth media. In all cases, we demonstrate that the fitness cost is consistent with the previous findings. We expand upon the previous theory by introducing a simple promoter activity model to quantitatively predict how basal promoter strength relates to growth rate and protein expression. We then estimate the amount of protein expression needed to support high flux through a heterologous metabolic pathway and predict the sizable fitness cost associated with enzyme production. This work has broad implications across applied biological sciences because it allows for prediction of the interplay between promoter strength, protein expression, and the resulting cost to microbial growth rates.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, BacterialPromoter Regions, GeneticAmidohydrolasesEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsGreen Fluorescent ProteinsMetabolic EngineeringModels, GeneticReproducibility of ResultsRibosomesamidaseAmidohydrolasesenhanced green fluorescent proteinEscherichia coli ProteinsGreen Fluorescent Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25286161
PMCPMC4186888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.