ArticleField methods2014
A Mixed Methods Approach to Network Data Collection.
Article in Field methods, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Influence network linkages across implementation strategy conditions in a randomized controlled trial of two strategies for scaling up evidence-based practices in public youth-serving systems.Implementation science : IS · 2013Trial
- Understanding the social networks that contribute to diversion in hospital inpatient pharmacies: A social network analysis.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2024Article
- Exploring the use of social network analysis methods in process improvement within healthcare organizations: a scoping review.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Gender Identity and Student Perceptions of Peer Research Aptitude in CUREs and Traditional Laboratory Courses in the Biological Sciences.CBE life sciences education · 2023Article
- Measuring sustainment of prevention programs and initiatives: a study protocol.Implementation science : IS · 2016Article
- Measuring Current Drug Use in Female Sex Workers and Their Noncommercial Male Partners in Mexico: Concordance Between Data Collected From Surveys Versus Semi-Structured Interviews.Substance use & misuse · 2016Article
- Testing the Community-Based Learning Collaborative (CBLC) implementation model: a study protocol.International journal of mental health systems · 2016Article
- Blending Qualitative and Computational Linguistics Methods for Fidelity Assessment: Experience with the Familias Unidas Preventive Intervention.Administration and policy in mental health · 2015Article
- Social Network Assessments and Interventions for Health Behavior Change: A Critical Review.Behavioral medicine (Washington, D.C.) · 2015Review
- Communication in Primary Care Teams and Diabetes Outcomes: A Social Network Analysis.Diabetes, obesity, and cardiometabolic CAREArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There is a growing interest in examining network processes with a mix of qualitative and quantitative network data. Research has consistently shown that free recall name generators entail recall bias and result in missing data that affects the quality of social network data. This study describes a mixed methods approach for collecting social network data, combining a free recall name generator in the context of an online survey with network relations data coded from transcripts of semi-structured qualitative interviews. The combined network provides substantially more information about the network space, both quantitatively and qualitatively. While network density was relatively stable across networks generated from different data collection methodologies, there were noticeable differences in centrality and component structure across networks. The approach presented here involved limited participant burden and generated more complete data than either technique alone could provide. We make suggestions for further development of this method.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.