Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25285015›Full record

ArticleOncoTargets and therapy2014

Clinical significance of UGT1A1 gene polymorphisms on irinotecan-based regimens as the treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Minmin Li, Zhehai Wang, Jun Guo, Jie Liu, Changzheng Li, Lin Liu, Huan Shi, Liyan Liu, Huihui Li, Chao Xie and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in OncoTargets and therapy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Oncotarget · 2018
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Relationship betweenOncoTargets and therapy · 2017
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Minmin LiSchool of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Jinan-Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Zhehai WangDepartment of Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Jun GuoDepartment of Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Jie LiuDepartment of Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Changzheng LiDepartment of Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Lin LiuDepartment of Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Huan ShiDepartment of Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Liyan LiuDepartment of Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Huihui LiDepartment of Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Chao XieDepartment of Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Xia ZhangDepartment of Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Wenwen SunSchool of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Jinan-Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Shu FangSchool of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Jinan-Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Xiang BiSchool of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Jinan-Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Shandong First Medical University · CNShandong Tumor Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe primary aim of this research was to investigate the association between uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase (UGT)1A1 gene polymorphisms and the toxicities of irinotecan-based regimens in Chinese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

methodsThe study analyzed the distribution of UGT1A1*28/*6 gene polymorphisms by polymerase chain reaction amplification and pyrosequencing. The adverse reactions and tumor response were evaluated according to National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 3.0, and Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors, Version 1.0, criteria, respectively. The correlation between UGT1A1 gene polymorphisms and severe delayed diarrhea or neutropenia was analyzed. The influences of UGT1A1*6/*28 polymorphisms on response rate and progression-free survival were also analyzed. Survival analysis was performed by the Kaplan-Meier method, and we used the log-rank test to analyze the effect of genotypes on progression-free survival, the logistic regression model for multivariate analysis, and the Cox regression model for multivariate survival analysis.

resultsA total of 167 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who were treated with irinotecan-based regimens and with detected UGT1A1 gene polymorphisms were enrolled in this research. The rate of UGT1A1*28 homozygous wild-type TA6/6, heterozygous mutant-type TA6/7, and homozygous mutant-type TA7/7 was 65.3% (109/167), 32.3% (54/167), and 2.4% (4/167), respectively; the incidence of UGT1A1*6 wild-type G/G was 67.1% (112/167), heterozygous mutant-type G/A accounted for 28.7% (48/167), and seven cases were homozygous mutant-type A/A (4.2%; 7/167). The incidence of grade 3 or 4 delayed diarrhea in patients carrying UGT1A1*6 (G/A and A/A) was higher than that in the wild-type (G/G) (P=0.021). The rate was significantly lower in patients with the UGT1A1*28 TA6/6 wide-type genotype than those with TA6/7 and TA7/7 mutant-type genotypes (P=0.027). However, neither UGT1A1*6 (P=0.34) nor UGT1A1*28 (P=0.232) variants were significantly associated with severe neutropenia. Our study found no significant differences of severe neutropenia in patients with different numbers of mutational alleles (P=0.354), but patients with two alleles or single allele variants had more chances to develop severe diarrhea than patients with wild-type (P=0.027). No significant differences of either response rate or progression-free survival were found among different genotypes (P>0.05).

conclusionFor irinotecan-based regimens in metastatic colorectal cancer, the UGT1A1*28 and UGT1A1*6 locus mutations can be regarded as predictors for irinotecan-associated severe delayed diarrhea, whereas no association between UGT1A1 gene polymorphisms and severe neutropenia was observed. We also found that neither clinical response nor prognosis were significantly associated with UGT1A1 gene polymorphisms.

Indexed as

gene polymorphismirinotecanmetastatic colorectal canceruridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A1

Identifiers

PMID25285015
PMCPMC4181635
OpenAlexW2029130050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.