ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2014
Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome-assisted flap creation for LASIK: a prospective, randomized, paired-eye study.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04426175 (Precision of 2D vs 3D Low Energy Femto-LASIK), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Precision of 2D vs 3D Low Energy Femto-LASIK: Intraoperative and Postoperative OCT-based Study
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of changes in refractive error and corneal curvature following small-incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser-assistedIndian journal of ophthalmology · 2018Trial
- Clinical and Wavefront Outcomes After Femtosecond Laser Versus Mechanical Microkeratome Lasik: A Prospective Paired-Eye Comparative Study.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Effect of Clear Corneal Incisions via Femtosecond Laser Versus Manual Incisions on Corneal Aberrations in Cataract Surgery.Micromachines · 2025Article
- The impact of corneal epithelial remodeling on visual quality after SMILE and FS-LASIK for high myopia.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Observational
- Postmortal epithelial changes of donor corneas impair applicability of a refractive ultraviolet femtosecond laser.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Elliptical versus circular flap configuration in myopic eyes undergoing femtosecond laserIndian journal of ophthalmology · 2021Article
- Why Use Ultrashort Pulses in Ophthalmology and Which Factors Affect Cut Quality.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021Review
- The 25th Anniversary of Laser Vision Correction in the United States.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2021Article
- Comparison of Laser In Situ Keratomileusis Flap Morphology and Predictability by WaveLight FS200 Femtosecond Laser and Moria Microkeratome: An Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography Study.Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO · 2019Article
- Corneal aberrations after small-incision lenticule extraction versus Q value-guided laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis.Medicine · 2019Observational
- Comparative Analysis of LASIK Flap Diameter and its Centration Using Two Different Femtosecond Lasers.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2019Article
- Predictive Factors for Successful High Myopia Treatment Using High-Frequency Laser-The open ophthalmology journal · 2018Article
- A Novel Laser Refractive Surgical Treatment for Presbyopia: Optics-Based Customization for Improved Clinical Outcome.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017Article
- Comparison of visual acuity, refractive outcomes, and satisfaction between LASIK performed with a microkeratome and a femto laser.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2017Article
- Corneal biomechanics after small-incision lenticule extraction versus Q-value-guided femtosecond laser-assistedJournal of current ophthalmology · 2016Article
- Quantitative Evaluation of Microdistortions in Bowman's Layer and Corneal Deformation after Small Incision Lenticule Extraction.Translational vision science & technology · 2016Article
- The evolution of corneal and refractive surgery with the femtosecond laser.Eye and vision (London, England) · 2015Review
- The Correlation Analysis between Corneal Biomechanical Properties and the Surgically Induced Corneal High-Order Aberrations after Small Incision Lenticule Extraction and Femtosecond Laser In Situ Keratomileusis.Journal of ophthalmology · 2015Article
- Safety and Precision of Two Different Flap-morphologies Created During Low Energy Femtosecond Laser-assisted LASIK.Journal of ophthalmic & vision researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo compare a femtosecond laser with a microkeratome for flap creation during laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in terms of flap thickness predictability and visual outcomes. PATIENTS AND
methodsThis was a prospective, randomized, masked, paired-eye study. Forty-four patients (34 females) who received bilateral LASIK were included. Patients were stratified by ocular dominance, and they then underwent randomization of flap creation using the femtosecond laser on one eye and undergoing the microkeratome procedure on the other one. The visual outcome differences between the corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) at baseline and the uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) on the first day postoperatively were set as the efficiency index for both groups. All visual acuity outcome results and the deviation of flap thickness were evaluated. P-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.
resultsThe index of efficiency regarding the postoperative visual outcomes in the microkeratome group was lower (P<0.0001). This result was correlated with the difference between intended and achieved flap thickness (P=0.038; r=0.28), and a negative relationship in the regression analysis was confirmed (P<0.04; R (2)=0.1428). The UDVA in the microkeratome group improved significantly by the end of the first month (P<0.0271) in comparison to the baseline CDVA. The deviation between intended and postoperative flap thickness using either optical coherence pachymetry or Heidelberg Retinal Tomography II confocal microscopy was statistically significant (paired t-test; P<0.001) between the groups. The flap thickness deviation in the microkeratome group was higher. In the femtosecond laser group, the efficiency index was stable postoperatively (P=0.64) The UDVA improved significantly by the end of the first postoperative week (P=0.0043) in comparison to the baseline CDVA. Six months after surgery, improvement in the UDVA was significant in both groups (all P<0.001; one way analysis of variance).
conclusionFemtosecond laser was superior to microkeratome-assisted LASIK in terms of flap thickness predictability and the speed of visual acuity recovery. A negative relationship in the regression analysis between increasing flap thickness deviation and visual acuity recovery was confirmed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.