Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25284975›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2014

Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome-assisted flap creation for LASIK: a prospective, randomized, paired-eye study.

Bojan Pajic, Iraklis Vastardis, Brigitte Pajic-Eggspuehler, Zisis Gatzioufas, Farhad Hafezi

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04426175 (Precision of 2D vs 3D Low Energy Femto-LASIK), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04426175 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Precision of 2D vs 3D Low Energy Femto-LASIK: Intraoperative and Postoperative OCT-based Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorZentrumsehstarke HamburgRan2019 to 2020Enrolled13ConditionsMyopia, AstigmatismArms2D and 3D cutting method using a low energy Femtosecond laser LDV Z8 for LASIK flap cutting
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. The 25th Anniversary of Laser Vision Correction in the United States.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Comparative Analysis of LASIK Flap Diameter and its Centration Using Two Different Femtosecond Lasers.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Bojan PajicSwiss Eye Research Foundation, Eye Clinic ORASIS, Reinach, Switzerland ; Division of Ophthalmology, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland ; Eye Hospital VIDAR-ORASIS Swiss, University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Physics, Novi Sad, Serbia ; Military Medical Academy, University of Defense, Belgrade, Serbia.
Iraklis VastardisSwiss Eye Research Foundation, Eye Clinic ORASIS, Reinach, Switzerland ; Eye Hospital VIDAR-ORASIS Swiss, University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Physics, Novi Sad, Serbia.
Brigitte Pajic-EggspuehlerSwiss Eye Research Foundation, Eye Clinic ORASIS, Reinach, Switzerland.
Zisis GatzioufasDivision of Ophthalmology, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Farhad HafeziDivision of Ophthalmology, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland ; Doheny Eye Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
University Hospital of Geneva · CHMilitary Medical Academy · RSUniversity of Novi Sad · RS

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare a femtosecond laser with a microkeratome for flap creation during laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in terms of flap thickness predictability and visual outcomes. PATIENTS AND

methodsThis was a prospective, randomized, masked, paired-eye study. Forty-four patients (34 females) who received bilateral LASIK were included. Patients were stratified by ocular dominance, and they then underwent randomization of flap creation using the femtosecond laser on one eye and undergoing the microkeratome procedure on the other one. The visual outcome differences between the corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) at baseline and the uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) on the first day postoperatively were set as the efficiency index for both groups. All visual acuity outcome results and the deviation of flap thickness were evaluated. P-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

resultsThe index of efficiency regarding the postoperative visual outcomes in the microkeratome group was lower (P<0.0001). This result was correlated with the difference between intended and achieved flap thickness (P=0.038; r=0.28), and a negative relationship in the regression analysis was confirmed (P<0.04; R (2)=0.1428). The UDVA in the microkeratome group improved significantly by the end of the first month (P<0.0271) in comparison to the baseline CDVA. The deviation between intended and postoperative flap thickness using either optical coherence pachymetry or Heidelberg Retinal Tomography II confocal microscopy was statistically significant (paired t-test; P<0.001) between the groups. The flap thickness deviation in the microkeratome group was higher. In the femtosecond laser group, the efficiency index was stable postoperatively (P=0.64) The UDVA improved significantly by the end of the first postoperative week (P=0.0043) in comparison to the baseline CDVA. Six months after surgery, improvement in the UDVA was significant in both groups (all P<0.001; one way analysis of variance).

conclusionFemtosecond laser was superior to microkeratome-assisted LASIK in terms of flap thickness predictability and the speed of visual acuity recovery. A negative relationship in the regression analysis between increasing flap thickness deviation and visual acuity recovery was confirmed.

Indexed as

femtosecond laserflap predictabilityLASIKmicrokeratome

Identifiers

PMID25284975
PMCPMC4181739
OpenAlexW2041231661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.