ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2014
Genomic prediction based on runs of homozygosity.
Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting productive, health, and reproductive traits in Mexican Holstein cattle using single nucleotide polymorphisms, haplotypes, and runs of homozygosity.JDS communications · 2026Article
- Genetic gain and inbreeding from simulation of different genomic mating schemes for pig improvement.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Using Pedigree and Genomic Data toward Better Management of Inbreeding in Italian Dairy Sheep and Goat Breeds.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- A genealogical estimate of genetic relationships.American journal of human genetics · 2022Article
- The distribution of runs of homozygosity in the genome of river and swamp buffaloes reveals a history of adaptation, migration and crossbred events.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2021Article
- Genome-Wide Analyses Reveal the Genetic Architecture and Candidate Genes of Indicine, Taurine, Synthetic Crossbreds, and Locally Adapted Cattle in Brazil.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Estimation of inbreeding and identification of regions under heavy selection based on runs of homozygosity in a Large White pig population.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2020Article
- Management of Genetic Diversity in the Era of Genomics.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- Genomic measures of inbreeding in the Norwegian-Swedish Coldblooded Trotter and their associations with known QTL for reproduction and health traits.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2019Article
- Weighted likelihood inference of genomic autozygosity patterns in dense genotype data.BMC genomics · 2017Article
- Design and validation of a 90K SNP genotyping assay for the water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis).PloS one · 2017Article
- Genomic analysis of Ugandan and Rwandan chicken ecotypes using a 600 k genotyping array.BMC genomics · 2016Article
- Compression distance can discriminate animals by genetic profile, build relationship matrices and estimate breeding values.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2015Article
- The effect of rare alleles on estimated genomic relationships from whole genome sequence data.BMC genetics · 2015Article
- Genome-wide estimates of coancestry, inbreeding and effective population size in the Spanish Holstein population.PloS one · 2015Article
- Artificial selection with traditional or genomic relationships: consequences in coancestry and genetic diversity.Frontiers in genetics · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGenomic prediction is based on the accurate estimation of the genomic relationships among and between training animals and selection candidates in order to obtain accurate estimates of the genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV). Various methods have been used to predict GEBV based on population-wide linkage disequilibrium relationships (G IBS ) or sometimes on linkage analysis relationships (G LA ). Here, we propose a novel method to predict GEBV based on a genomic relationship matrix using runs of homozygosity (G ROH ). Runs of homozygosity were used to derive probabilities of multi-locus identity by descent chromosome segments. The accuracy and bias of the prediction of GEBV using G ROH were compared to those using G IBS and G LA . Comparisons were performed using simulated datasets derived from a random pedigree and a real pedigree of Italian Brown Swiss bulls. The comparison of accuracies of GEBV was also performed on data from 1086 Italian Brown Swiss dairy cattle.
resultsSimulations with various thresholds of minor allele frequency for markers and quantitative trait loci showed that G ROH achieved consistently more accurate GEBV (0 to 4% points higher) than G IBS and G LA . The bias of GEBV prediction for simulated data was higher based on the real pedigree than based on a random pedigree. In the analyses with real data, G ROH and G LA had similar accuracies. However, G LA achieved a higher accuracy when the prediction was done on the youngest animals. The G IBS matrices calculated with and without standardized marker genotypes resulted in similar accuracies.
conclusionsThe present study proposes G ROH as a novel method to estimate genomic relationship matrices and predict GEBV based on runs of homozygosity and shows that it can result in higher or similar accuracies of GEBV prediction than G LA , except for the real data analysis with validation of young animals. Compared to G IBS , G ROH resulted in more accurate GEBV predictions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.