Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25284288›Full record

ReviewTrends in genetics : TIG2015

Higher-order genetic interactions and their contribution to complex traits.

Matthew B Taylor, Ian M Ehrenreich

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in genetics : TIG, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 86 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
86citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

86 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Deconstruction ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Integrating multi-omics and machine learning for disease resistance prediction in legumes.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Matthew B TaylorMolecular and Computational Biology Section, University of Southern California, 1050 Childs Way RRI 201B, Los Angeles, CA 90089-2910, USA.
Ian M EhrenreichMolecular and Computational Biology Section, University of Southern California, 1050 Childs Way RRI 201B, Los Angeles, CA 90089-2910, USA. Electronic address: Ian.Ehrenreich@usc.edu.

Funding

Comprehensive dissection of higher-order genetic interactionsR01GM110255 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI EHRENREICH, IAN MICHAEL · 2014 to 2018
$1.4M
Genetic basis and pathogenicity of invasive growth in yeastR21AI108939 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI EHRENREICH, IAN MICHAEL · 2014 to 2015
$439k
NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI108939NIAID NIH HHS R21AI108939NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM110255NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM110255
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The contribution of genetic interactions involving three or more loci to complex traits is poorly understood. These higher-order genetic interactions (HGIs) are difficult to detect in genetic mapping studies, therefore, few examples of them have been described. However, the lack of data on HGIs should not be misconstrued as proof that this class of genetic effect is unimportant. To the contrary, evidence from model organisms suggests that HGIs frequently influence genetic studies and contribute to many complex traits. Here, we review the growing literature on HGIs and discuss the future of research on this topic.

Indexed as

Epistasis, GeneticQuantitative Trait, HeritableAnimalsHumansModels, GeneticQuantitative Trait Locicomplex traitsepistasisgenetic interactionshigher-order epistasishigher-order genetic interactions

Identifiers

PMID25284288
PMCPMC4281285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.