Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25284266›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2014

Influence of spinal and general anesthesia on the metabolic, hormonal, and hemodynamic response in elective surgical patients.

Snezana B Milosavljevic, Aleksandar P Pavlovic, Sladjana V Trpkovic, Aleksandra N Ilić, Ana D Sekulic

Open access · hybridAbstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Monitoring the Changes of Upper Limb Water in Breast Cancer Patients by Segmental Multi-Frequency Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Snezana B MilosavljevicDepartment of Surgery, General Hospital, Kosovska Mitrovica, Serbia.
Aleksandar P PavlovicDepartment of Surgery, Medical Faculty, University of Pristina, Kosovska Mitrovica, Serbia.
Sladjana V TrpkovicDepartment of Surgery, Medical Faculty, University of Pristina, Kosovska Mitrovica, Serbia.
Aleksandra N IlićDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Pristina, Kosovska Mitrovica, Serbia.
Ana D SekulicDepartment of Anesthesiology, CHC "Bezanijska Kosa", Belgrade, Serbia.
University Hospital Medical Center Bezanijska kosa · RS

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of the study was to determine the significance of spinal anesthesia in the suppression of the metabolic, hormonal, and hemodynamic response to surgical stress in elective surgical patients compared to general anesthesia. MATERIAL AND

methodsThe study was clinical, prospective, and controlled and it involved 2 groups of patients (the spinal and the general anesthesia group) who underwent the same surgery. We monitored the metabolic and hormonal response to perioperative stress based on serum cortisol level and glycemia. We also examined how the different techniques of anesthesia affect these hemodynamic parameters: systolic arterial pressure (AP), diastolic AP, heart rate (HR), and arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2). These parameters were measured before induction on anesthesia (T1), 30 min after the surgical incisions (T2), 1 h postoperatively (T3) and 24 h after surgery (T4).

resultsSerum cortisol levels were significantly higher in the general anesthesia group compared to the spinal anesthesia group (p<0.01). Glycemia was significantly higher in the general anesthesia group (p<0.05). There was a statistically significant, positive correlation between serum cortisol levels and glycemia at all times observed (p<0.01). Systolic and diastolic AP did not differ significantly between the groups (p=0.191, p=0.101). The HR was significantly higher in the general anesthesia group (p<0.01). SpO2 values did not differ significantly between the groups (p=0.081).

conclusionsBased on metabolic, hormonal, and hemodynamic responses, spinal anesthesia proved more effective than general anesthesia in suppressing stress response in elective surgical patients.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, GeneralAnesthesia, SpinalElective Surgical ProceduresHemodynamicsAdultAgedFemaleHumansHydrocortisoneMaleMetabolismMiddle AgedProspective StudiesHydrocortisone

Identifiers

PMID25284266
PMCPMC4199462
OpenAlexW2038266547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.