ReviewJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2014
Perspectives on human-human sensorimotor interactions for the design of rehabilitation robots.
Review in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Overground robotic training effects on walking and secondary health conditions in individuals with spinal cord injury: systematic review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2022Pooled it
- Trends in robot-assisted and virtual reality-assisted neuromuscular therapy: a systematic review of health-related multiplayer games.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2018Pooled it
- Exploiting telerobotics for sensorimotor rehabilitation: a locomotor embodiment.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2021Trial
- Impact of game mode in multi-user serious games for upper limb rehabilitation: a within-person randomized trial on engagement and social involvement.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2019Trial
- Intuitive therapist robot patient physical interaction is worth a thousand words.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Transformative biomechanics and mechanobiology breakthroughs shaping the future of health and medicine.Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)) · 2026Review
- Evaluating self-assistance during functional reach with a passive hydrostatic exoskeleton under artificial impairment.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025Article
- The cognitive neuroscience and neurocognitive rehabilitation of dance.BMC neuroscience · 2024Review
- NSF DARE-Transforming modeling in neurorehabilitation: Four threads for catalyzing progress.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2024Review
- Learning acquisition of consistent leader-follower relationships depends on implicit haptic interactions.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Neurorehabilitation robotics: how much control should therapists have?Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Article
- Humans utilize sensory evidence of others' intended action to make online decisions.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Human-machine-human interaction in motor control and rehabilitation: a review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2021Review
- Bounded rational response equilibria in human sensorimotor interactions.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2021Article
- Trends in Haptic Communication of Human-Human Dyads: Toward Natural Human-Robot Co-manipulation.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2021Article
- The Importance of Being in Touch.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Review
- Mutual Skill Learning and Adaptability to Others via Haptic Interaction.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2021Article
- For Motion Assistance Humans Prefer to Rely on a Robot Rather Than on an Unpredictable Human.IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2020Article
- Learning to shape virtual patient locomotor patterns: internal representations adapt to exploit interactive dynamics.Journal of neurophysiology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Physical interactions between patients and therapists during rehabilitation have served as motivation for the design of rehabilitation robots, yet we lack a fundamental understanding of the principles governing such human-human interactions (HHI). Here we review the literature and pose important open questions regarding sensorimotor interaction during HHI that could facilitate the design of human-robot interactions (HRI) and haptic interfaces for rehabilitation. Based on the goals of physical rehabilitation, three subcategories of sensorimotor interaction are identified: sensorimotor collaboration, sensorimotor assistance, and sensorimotor education. Prior research has focused primarily on sensorimotor collaboration and is generally limited to relatively constrained visuomotor tasks. Moreover, the mechanisms by which performance improvements are achieved during sensorimotor cooperation with haptic interaction remains unknown. We propose that the effects of role assignment, motor redundancy, and skill level in sensorimotor cooperation should be explicitly studied. Additionally, the importance of haptic interactions may be better revealed in tasks that do not require visual feedback. Finally, cooperative motor tasks that allow for motor improvement during solo performance to be examined may be particularly relevant for rehabilitation robotics. Identifying principles that guide human-human sensorimotor interactions may lead to the development of robots that can physically interact with humans in more intuitive and biologically inspired ways, thereby enhancing rehabilitation outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.