ArticleJournal of endocrinological investigation2014
Efficacy of sorafenib and impact on cardiac function in patients with thyroid cancer: a retrospective analysis.
Article in Journal of endocrinological investigation, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeSorafenib has recently been recognized as an important standard option for the management of patients with differentiated thyroid cancer. Although data concerning cardiac safety are available in pan-tumor studies, no data are available on its use in everyday clinical practice in patients with thyroid cancer.
methodsIn the off-label program of our institution, we enrolled 14 patients with different histological types of thyroid cancer suitable for treatment with sorafenib. Our aims were to evaluate cardiac safety factors-LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction), heart rate and blood pressure-the cardiac markers NT-proBNP and troponin I, radiological response evaluated by CT and (18)FDG-PET (according to RECIST 1.1 criteria) and biomarker reduction (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status: ECOG PS) 0-2.
resultsPatients with ECOG PS 2 accounted for 36%. After starting sorafenib, many patients displayed reduced or stabilized metabolic activity in target lesions (clinical benefit = 44%), radiologic reduction or stabilization (74%) and decreased cancer markers (90%). Lung metastases displayed the largest reductions in size. Median overall survival (OS) was 7 months and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3 months. No sign of cardiotoxicity was observed in almost all patients. LVEF was altered in two patients and proved symptomatic in one.
conclusionsSorafenib seems to be effective in reducing disease progression in the early stages of treatment (3-6 months). Responses varied considerably according to the criteria investigated. Cardiac toxicities did not raise concerns and were in line with data reported in other malignancies. However, cardiac monitoring is recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.