Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25283514›Full record

ArticleFamilial cancer2015

Long-term outcomes of risk-reducing surgery in unaffected women at increased familial risk of breast and/or ovarian cancer.

Louise Heiniger, Phyllis N Butow, Joseph Coll, Tracey Bullen, Judy Wilson, Brandi Baylock, Bettina Meiser, Melanie A Price

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Familial cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Risk-reducing mastectomy for the prevention of primary breast cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Counselling Framework for GermlineCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Choosing high-risk screeningGland surgery · 2019
    Article
  12. Selected medical interventions in women with a deleteriousCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2019
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Louise HeinigerCentre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-Based Decision-Making (CeMPED), School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Level 6 North, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse (C39Z), Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Phyllis N Butow
Joseph Coll
Tracey Bullen
Judy Wilson
Brandi Baylock
Bettina Meiser
Melanie A Price
Cooperative Trials Group for Neuro-Oncology · AUUniversity of Sydney · AUChris O’Brien Lifehouse · AUPrince of Wales Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study prospectively investigated long-term psychosocial outcomes for women who opted for risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) and/or risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO). Unaffected women from high-risk breast cancer families who had completed baseline questionnaires for an existing study and subsequently underwent RRM and/or RRSO, completed measures of perceived breast and ovarian cancer risk, anxiety, depression, cancer-related anxiety, body image, sexual functioning, menopausal symptoms, use of hormone replacement therapy and decision regret 3 years post-surgery. Outcomes were compared to age- and risk-matched controls. Participants (N = 233) were 17 women who had RRM (39 controls), 38 women who had RRSO (94 controls) and 15 women who had RRM + RRSO (30 controls). Women who underwent RRM and those who underwent RRM + RRSO reported reductions in perceived breast cancer risk and perceived breast and ovarian cancer risk respectively, compared to their respective controls. RRM women reported greater reductions in cancer-related anxiety compared with both controls and RRSO women. RRSO women reported more sexual discomfort than controls and more urogenital menopausal symptoms than controls and RRM only women. No differences in general anxiety, depression or body image were observed. Regret was associated with greater reductions in body image since surgery and more sexual discomfort, although overall regret levels were low. Women who undergo RRM experience psychological benefits associated with reduced breast cancer risk. Although women who undergo RRSO experience some deterioration in sexual and menopausal symptoms, they do not regret their surgery decision. It is vital that women considering these procedures receive detailed information about potential psychosocial consequences.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMastectomyMiddle AgedOvarian NeoplasmsOvariectomyProphylactic Surgical ProceduresSalpingectomyTime

Identifiers

PMID25283514
OpenAlexW2075341290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.