Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25283182›Full record

ArticleClinical neuroradiology2016

Reproducibility of Tract-based and Region-of-Interest DTI Analysis of Long Association Tracts.

N Brandstack, T Kurki, J Laalo, T Kauko, O Tenovuo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical neuroradiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

N BrandstackDepartment of Radiology, Helsinki University Hospital, PL 340, 00029, HUS, Finland. nina.brandstack@hus.fi.
T KurkiDepartment of Radiology, Terveystalo Turku Pulssi Medical Centre, Turku, Finland.
J LaaloDepartment of Radiology, Turku University Hospital, PL 52, 20521, Turku, Finland.
T KaukoDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
O TenovuoDepartment of Neurology, Turku University Hospital, PL 52, 20521, Turku, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeReproducibility of two different methods for quantifying fiber tracts by using a diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) sequence suitable for clinical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocols was evaluated.

methodsDTI of 15 subjects was used to analyze intra-rater and inter-rater reproducibility. Another 10 subjects underwent MRI twice for assessment of between-scan reliability. Ten long association tracts were defined by fiber tracking using inclusion and exclusion regions of interest (ROIs). Whole-tract analysis and tractography-based core analysis were performed, and the effect of fractional anisotropy (FA 0.15/0.30) and turning angle threshold (27°/60°) on reproducibility was evaluated. Additionally, ROI measurements were performed in the core of the tracts.

resultsFor the tract-based methods, intra-rater and inter-rater reliabilities of FA and mean diffusivity (MD) measurements were excellent. Between-scan reproducibility was good or excellent in 127 of 130 of the measurements. There was no systematic difference in the reproducibility of the FA, MD, and volume measurements depending on the FA or turning angle threshold. For the cross-sectional ROI measurements, reliability showed large variation from poor to excellent depending on the tract.

conclusionsCompared with the commonly used cross-sectional core ROI method, the tract-based analyses seem to be a more robust way to identify and measure white matter tracts of interest, and provide a novel reproducible tool to perform core analysis.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnisotropyBrainBrain Injuries, TraumaticDiffusion Tensor ImagingFemaleHumansImage EnhancementImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedObserver VariationReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityWhite MatterCore ROI methodDTI tractographyReproducibilityTract-based analyses

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.