Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25282578›Full record

Trial reportJournal of substance abuse treatment2015

A randomized trial of computerized vs. in-person brief intervention for illicit drug use in primary care: outcomes through 12 months.

Jan Gryczynski, Shannon Gwin Mitchell, Arturo Gonzales, Ana Moseley, Thomas R Peterson, Steven J Ondersma, Kevin E O'Grady, Robert P Schwartz

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of substance abuse treatment, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Cognitive behavioral interventions for alcohol and drug use disorders: Through the stage model and back again.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2017
    Review
  17. Observational
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jan GryczynskiFriends Research Institute, Baltimore, MD USA. Electronic address: jgryczynski@friendsresearch.org.
Shannon Gwin MitchellFriends Research Institute, Baltimore, MD USA.
Arturo GonzalesSangre de Cristo Community Health Partnership, Santa Fe, NM USA.
Ana MoseleySangre de Cristo Community Health Partnership, Santa Fe, NM USA.
Thomas R PetersonSangre de Cristo Community Health Partnership, Santa Fe, NM USA.
Steven J OndersmaWayne State University, Detroit, MI USA.
Kevin E O'GradyUniversity of Maryland, College Park, Department of Psychology, College Park, MD USA.
Robert P SchwartzFriends Research Institute, Baltimore, MD USA.
Community Health Partnership · USFriends Research Institute · USUniversity of Maryland, College Park · USWayne State University · US

Funding

SBIRT in New MexicoR01DA026003 · NIDA · FRIENDS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, INC. · PI SCHWARTZ, ROBERT P · 2009 to 2013
$2.5M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA026003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examined outcomes through 12 months from a randomized trial comparing computerized brief intervention (CBI) vs. in-person brief intervention (IBI) delivered by behavioral health counselors for adult community health center patients with moderate-level drug misuse (N=360). Data were collected at baseline, 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up, and included the Alcohol, Smoking, and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST) and laboratory analysis of hair samples. Repeated measures analyses examined differential change over time. There were no significant differences in drug-positive hair tests over time or by condition. Global ASSIST scores decreased in both conditions (p<.001), but there were no significant differences between conditions in overall change across 12 months of follow-up (p=.13). CBI produced greater overall reductions in alcohol (p=.04) and cocaine (p=.02) ASSIST scores than IBI, with initial differences dissipating over time. Computerized brief interventions present a viable alternative to traditional in-person brief interventions.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareTherapy, Computer-AssistedAdultCounselingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychotherapy, BriefSubstance-Related DisordersTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultBrief interventionComputerized interventionDrug misusePrimary careSBIRT

Identifiers

PMID25282578
PMCPMC4304885
OpenAlexW1986533110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.