Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25281830›Full record

ReviewExperimental eye research2014

Cellular and extracellular matrix modulation of corneal stromal opacity.

Andre A M Torricelli, Steven E Wilson

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental eye research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 122 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Diabetic keratopathy and nuclear proteins (Review).Molecular medicine reports · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Repurposing verteporfin and hyaluronic acid gel for ocular surface treatment to prevent corneal scarring.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Corneal Neurotization: Preoperative Patient Workup and Surgical Decision-making.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andre A M TorricelliCole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Steven E WilsonCole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. Electronic address: wilsons4@ccf.org.
Cleveland Clinic · US

Funding

Vision Research CoreP30EY001730 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MAUREEN E NEITZ · 1985 to 2026
$23.5M
Corneal Epithelial Growth Factors and ReceptorsR01EY010056 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WILSON, STEVEN EUGENE · 1994 to 2020
$7.4M
Vision Research Infrastructure Development GrantR24EY015638 · NEI · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI HOLLYFIELD, JOE GILBERT · 2004 to 2008
$1.1M
NEI NIH HHS EY015638NEI NIH HHS EY10056NEI NIH HHS P30 EY001730NEI NIH HHS R01 EY010056NEI NIH HHS R24 EY015638
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stromal transparency is a critical factor contributing to normal function of the visual system. Corneal injury, surgery, disease and infection elicit complex wound healing responses that serve to protect against insults and maintain the integrity of the cornea, and subsequently to restore corneal structure and transparency. However, in some cases these processes result in prolonged loss of corneal transparency and resulting diminished vision. Corneal opacity is mediated by the complex actions of many cytokines, growth factors, and chemokines produced by the epithelial cells, stromal cells, bone marrow-derived cells, lacrimal tissues, and nerves. Myofibroblasts, and the disorganized extracellular matrix produced by these cells, are critical determinants of the level and persistence of stromal opacity after corneal injury. Decreases in corneal crystallins in myofibroblasts and corneal fibroblasts contribute to cellular opacity in the stroma. Regeneration of a fully functional epithelial basement membrane (BM) appears to have a critical role in the maintenance of corneal stromal transparency after mild injuries and recovery of transparency when opacity is generated after severe injuries. The epithelial BM likely has a regulatory function whereby it modulates epithelium-derived growth factors such as transforming growth factor (TGF) β and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) that drive the development and persistence of myofibroblasts from precursor cells. The purpose of this article is to review the factors involved in the maintenance of corneal transparency and to highlight the mechanisms involved in the appearance, persistency and regression of corneal opacity after stromal injury.

Indexed as

AnimalsCorneal OpacityCorneal StromaExtracellular MatrixHumansBone marrow-derived cellsCorneaEpithelial basement membraneFibrocytesMyofibroblastsStroma HazeWound healing

Identifiers

PMID25281830
PMCPMC4259857
OpenAlexW1997214631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.