Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25281774›Full record

ReviewGenomics2014

The enduring utility of continuous culturing in experimental evolution.

David Gresham, Maitreya J Dunham

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genomics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Adaptive Laboratory Evolution of Pichia pastoris by Serial Batch Cultivation.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Mutation bias and adaptation in bacteria.Microbiology (Reading, England) · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

David GreshamCenter for Genomics and Systems Biology, Department of Biology, New York University, New York NY, USA. Electronic address: dgresham@nyu.edu.
Maitreya J DunhamDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle WA, USA. Electronic address: maitreya@uw.edu.

Funding

ZDS2P REGULATES SWE1P-DEPENDENT POLARIZED CELL GROWTH IN S CEREVISIAEP41RR011823 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DAVIS, TRACY · 1996 to 2011
$24.7M
TrainingP41GM103533 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MACCOSS, MICHAEL · 2012 to 2021
$20.7M
Regulation of Quiescence in Eukaryotic CellsR01GM107466 · NIGMS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI GRESHAM, DAVID · 2013 to 2022
$3.0M
Genetic basis of stress tolerance in natural populations of yeastR01GM101091 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DUNHAM, MAITREYA J, HESS, DAVID CHARLES · 2012 to 2020
$2.0M
Causes and consequences of gene copy number change in adapting yeast populationsR01GM094306 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DUNHAM, MAITREYA J · 2011 to 2015
$1.3M
NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR011823NIGMS NIH HHS GM107466NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103533NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM094306NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM101091NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM107466
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studying evolution in the laboratory provides a means of understanding the processes, dynamics and outcomes of adaptive evolution in precisely controlled and readily replicated conditions. The advantages of experimental evolution are maximized when the selection is well defined, which enables linking genotype, phenotype and fitness. One means of maintaining a defined selection is continuous culturing: chemostats enable the study of adaptive evolution in constant nutrient-limited environments, whereas cells in turbidostats evolve in constant nutrient abundance. Although the experimental effort required for continuous culturing is considerable relative to the experimental simplicity of serial batch culture, the opposite is true of the environments they produce: continuous culturing results in simplified and invariant conditions whereas serially diluted batch cultures are complex and dynamic. The comparative simplicity of the selective environment that is unique to continuous culturing provides an ideal experimental system for addressing key questions in adaptive evolution.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionAdaptation, BiologicalAnimalsBatch Cell Culture TechniquesEvolution, MolecularGenetic FitnessGenotypeMutationPhenotypeSelection, GeneticChemostatContinuous cultureExperimental evolutionMicrobial evolutionTurbidostat

Identifiers

PMID25281774
PMCPMC4411559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.