Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25281329›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of membrane biology2015

Thermodynamics of Membrane Insertion and Refolding of the Diphtheria Toxin T-Domain.

Mauricio Vargas-Uribe, Mykola V Rodnin, Karin Öjemalm, Aurora Holgado, Alexander Kyrychenko, IngMarie Nilsson, Yevgen O Posokhov, George Makhatadze, Gunnar von Heijne, Alexey S Ladokhin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of membrane biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Mauricio Vargas-UribeDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA.
Mykola V Rodnin
Karin Öjemalm
Aurora Holgado
Alexander Kyrychenko
IngMarie Nilsson
Yevgen O Posokhov
George Makhatadze
Gunnar von Heijne
Alexey S Ladokhin
Stockholm University · SEUniversity of Kansas Medical Center · USRensselaer Polytechnic Institute · USV. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University · UA

Funding

pH-Triggered Membrane Insertion of ProteinsR01GM069783 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI COCCO, MELANIE J, KURNIKOVA, MARIA G · 2004 to 2014
$2.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM-069783NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM069783
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diphtheria toxin translocation (T) domain inserts into the endosomal membrane in response to the endosomal acidification and enables the delivery of the catalytic domain into the cell. The insertion pathway consists of a series of conformational changes that occur in solution and in the membrane and leads to the conversion of a water-soluble state into a transmembrane state. In this work, we utilize various biophysical techniques to characterize the insertion pathway from the thermodynamic perspective. Thermal and chemical unfolding measured by differential scanning calorimetry, circular dichroism, and tryptophan fluorescence reveal that the free energy of unfolding of the T-domain at neutral and mildly acidic pH differ by 3-5 kcal/mol, depending on the experimental conditions. Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy measurements show that the free energy change from the membrane-competent state to the interfacial state is approximately -8 kcal/mol and is pH-independent, while that from the membrane-competent state to the transmembrane state ranges between -9.5 and -12 kcal/mol, depending on the membrane lipid composition and pH. Finally, the thermodynamics of transmembrane insertion of individual helices was tested using an in vitro assay that measures the translocon-assisted integration of test sequences into the microsomal membrane. These experiments suggest that even the most hydrophobic helix TH8 has only a small favorable free energy of insertion. The free energy for the insertion of the consensus insertion unit TH8-TH9 is slightly more favorable, yet less favorable than that measured for the entire protein, suggesting a cooperative effect for the membrane insertion of the helices of the T-domain.

Indexed as

Diphtheria ToxinHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsModels, MolecularProtein BindingProtein RefoldingProtein Structure, SecondaryProtein Structure, TertiaryProtein TransportThermodynamicsDiphtheria Toxin

Identifiers

PMID25281329
PMCPMC4385515
OpenAlexW1998226664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.