ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2014
Patient participation in decisions about disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs: a cross-sectional survey.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs and patient-reported outcomes in axial SpA: a systematic review and a call for action.Clinical rheumatology · 2021Pooled it
- Evaluating Risk Tolerance from a Systematic Review of Preferences: The Case of Patients with Psoriasis.The patient · 2018Pooled it
- Shared Decision-Making and Patient Enablement in Outpatient Rehabilitation: An Observational Study.Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy · 2026Observational
- Exploring people-centred healthcare in arthritis care: a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Article
- Co-Design of a Disease Activity Based Self-Management Approach for Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.Mediterranean journal of rheumatology · 2021Article
- Article
- Exploring healthcare professionals' knowledge, attitudes and experiences of shared decision making in rheumatology.RMD open · 2020Article
- How to Get the Most from Methotrexate (MTX) Treatment for Your Rheumatoid Arthritis Patient?-MTX in the Treat-to-Target Strategy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Article
- How Much Information and Participation Do Patients with Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases Prefer in Interaction with Physicians? Results of a Participatory Research Project.Patient preference and adherence · 2019Article
- Patient-reported outcomes in European spondyloarthritis patients: a systematic review of the literature.Patient preference and adherence · 2018Review
- Article
- OMERACT Quality-adjusted Life-years (QALY) Working Group: Do Current QALY Measures Capture What Matters to Patients?The Journal of rheumatology · 2017Article
- Disease activity dynamics in rheumatoid arthritis: patients' self-assessment of disease activity via WebApp.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2017Article
- Leveraging the electronic health record to improve quality and safety in rheumatology.Rheumatology international · 2017Review
- Misalignment between physicians and patient satisfaction with psoriatic arthritis disease control.Clinical rheumatology · 2017Article
- Who wants to be involved in health care decisions? Comparing preferences for individual and collective involvement in England and Sweden.BMC public health · 2017Article
- Development of a web-based patient decision aid for initiating disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs using user-centred design methods.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2017Article
- [Shared decision making even for complex systemic autoimmune diseases such as Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)?]Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2017Article
- Patient-reported outcome assessment of inflammatory arthritis patient experience with intravenously administered biologic therapy.Patient preference and adherence · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInvolvement of patients in decision-making about medication is currently being advocated. This study examined (the concordance between) inflammatory arthritis patients' preferred and perceived involvement in decision-making in general, and in four specific decisions about Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs). Furthermore, this study examined how patients' involvement is related to satisfaction about decision-making and which factors are related to preferred roles, perceived roles and concordance.
methodsUsing a cross-sectional survey, 894 patients diagnosed with Rheumatoid Arthritis, Psoriatic Arthritis or Ankylosing Spondylitis were sent a questionnaire which focused on medical decisions in general and on four specific decisions: (a) starting with a traditional DMARD; (b) starting to inject methotrexate; (c) starting a biological DMARD; and (d) decreasing or stopping a DMARD. For each decision preferred and perceived involvement in decision-making was assessed using the Control Preference Scale. Concordance was calculated by subtracting the scores for perceived role from scores for the preferred role. Furthermore, satisfaction with the decision process and socio-demographic, health-related, patient-related and physician-related variables were assessed.
resultsThe response rate was 58%. For all decisions, most patients (59%-63%) preferred Shared Decision-Making (SDM). SDM was perceived frequently (26%-55%) and patients' preferences were met in 54% of the respondents. Yet, in some specific decisions, 26% to 54% of patients would have liked more participation. Perceiving less participation then preferred was associated with less satisfaction with the decision-process, but perceiving more participation than preferred was not. Our results did not reveal any meaningful models to predict preferred or perceived participation in decision-making in general or with reference to specific decisions about DMARDs.
conclusionsMost arthritis patients prefer to be involved in decisions about their medication and SDM is perceived frequently. Yet, in some specific decisions patient participation can be further improved. Patients especially prefer more participation in decision-making regarding starting a first traditional DMARD, which occurs most commonly in newly diagnosed patients. Whereas perceiving too little participation was associated with decreased satisfaction, perceiving too much participation was not. Therefore, rheumatologists should urge patients to participate in every medical decision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.