Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25280869›Full record

Trial reportBMC pulmonary medicine2014

TargetCOPD: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial of targeted case finding for COPD versus routine practice in primary care: protocol.

Rachel E Jordan, Peymané Adab, Sue Jowett, Jen L Marsh, Richard D Riley, Alexandra Enocson, Martin R Miller, Brendan G Cooper, Alice M Turner, Jon G Ayres and 7 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyPragmatic Clinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03355677 (A Clinical Interventional Study Into Airways Disease Case Finding and Complex Case Management), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03355677 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

A Clinical Interventional Study Into Airways Disease Case Finding and Complex Case Management

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of SouthamptonRan2017 to 2019Enrolled327ConditionsCOPD, AsthmaArmsCase finding Clinic, At Risk Case Clinics, Usual Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Case-finding for COPD in primary care: a qualitative study of patients' perspectives.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Clinical highlights from Amsterdam.ERJ open research · 2016
    Article
  9. Case finding for COPD in primary care: a qualitative study of the views of health professionals.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Rachel E Jordan
Peymané AdabSchool of Health and Populations Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. p.adab@bham.ac.uk.
Sue Jowett
Jen L Marsh
Richard D Riley
Alexandra Enocson
Martin R Miller
Brendan G Cooper
Alice M Turner
Jon G Ayres
Kar Keung Cheng
Kate Jolly
Robert A Stockley
Sheila Greenfield
Stanley Siebert
Amanda Daley
David A Fitzmaurice

Funding

Department of Health PDF/01/023Department of Health RP-PG-0109-10061Medical Research Council MR/K00414X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany people with clinically significant chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remain undiagnosed worldwide. There are a number of small studies which have examined possible methods of case finding through primary care, but no large RCTs that have adequately assessed the most cost-effective approach. METHODS/

designIn this study, using a cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) in 56 general practices in the West Midlands, we plan to investigate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a Targeted approach to case finding for COPD compared with routine practice. Using an individual patient RCT nested in the Targeted arm, we plan also to compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of Active case finding using a postal questionnaire (with supplementary opportunistic questionnaires), and Opportunistic-only case finding during routine surgery consultations.All ever-smoking patients aged 40-79 years, without a current diagnosis of COPD and registered with participating practices will be eligible. Patients in the Targeted arm who report positive respiratory symptoms (chronic cough or phlegm, wheeze or dyspnoea) using a brief questionnaire will be invited for further spirometric assessment to ascertain whether they have COPD or not. Post-bronchodilator spirometry will be conducted to ATS standards using an Easy One spirometer by trained research assistants.The primary outcomes will be new cases of COPD and cost per new case identified, comparing targeted case finding with routine care, and two types of targeted case finding (active versus opportunistic). A multilevel logistic regression model will be used to model the probability of detecting a new case of COPD for each treatment arm, with clustering of patients (by practice and household) accounted for using a multi-level structure.A trial-based analysis will be undertaken using costs and outcomes collected during the trial. Secondary outcomes include the feasibility, efficiency, long-term cost-effectiveness, patient and primary care staff views of each approach. DISCUSSION: This will be the largest RCT of its kind, and should inform how best to identify undiagnosed patients with COPD in the UK and other similar healthcare systems. Sensitivity analyses will help local policy-makers decide which sub-groups of the population to target first.

trial registrationCurrent controlled trials ISRCTN14930255.

Indexed as

Health Care CostsResearch DesignAdultAgedAttitude of Health PersonnelCost-Benefit AnalysisCoughDyspneaGeneral PracticeHumansMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CarePrimary Health CarePulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveRespiratory SoundsSmoking

Identifiers

PMID25280869
PMCPMC4271517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.