Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25280765›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology2014

Conflict on the sex chromosomes: cause, effect, and complexity.

Judith E Mank, David J Hosken, Nina Wedell

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. eLife · 2024
    Article
  6. Evolution of sex-biased genes inEcology and evolution · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Gene-rich X chromosomes implicate intragenomic conflict in the evolution of bizarre genetic systems.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Sex-biased gene expression and recent sex chromosome turnover.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Judith E MankDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.
David J HoskenCentre for Ecology & Conservation, University of Exeter, Cornwall, Tremough, Penryn TR10 9EZ, United Kingdom.
Nina WedellCentre for Ecology & Conservation, University of Exeter, Cornwall, Tremough, Penryn TR10 9EZ, United Kingdom.

Funding

European Research Council 260233
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intralocus sexual conflict and intragenomic conflict both affect sex chromosome evolution and can in extreme cases even cause the complete turnover of sex chromosomes. Additionally, established sex chromosomes often become the focus of heightened conflict. This creates a tangled relationship between sex chromosomes and conflict with respect to cause and effect. To further complicate matters, sexual and intragenomic conflict may exacerbate one another and thereby further fuel sex chromosome change. Different magnitudes and foci of conflict offer potential explanations for lineage-specific variation in sex chromosome evolution and answer long-standing questions as to why some sex chromosomes are remarkably stable, whereas others show rapid rates of evolutionary change.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularModels, GeneticAnimalsDosage Compensation, GeneticGenetic FitnessPopulation DensityRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidSelection, GeneticSex ChromosomesSex Factors

Identifiers

PMID25280765
PMCPMC4292157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.