Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25280761›Full record

Trial reportJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2014

Feasibility and operator variability of myocardial blood flow and reserve measurements with ⁹⁹mTc-sestamibi quantitative dynamic SPECT/CT imaging.

Ran Klein, Guang-Uei Hung, Tao-Cheng Wu, Wen-Sheng Huang, Dianfu Li, Robert A deKemp, Bailing Hsu

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. EANM practice guideline for quantitative SPECT-CT.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023
    Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Myocardial blood flow quantitation with the SPECT technique: Where do we stand?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  6. SPECT quantification of myocardial blood flow: Another step toward widespread availability.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  7. Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  8. Quantification of myocardial blood flow by CZT-SPECT with motion correction and comparison withJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  9. The potential of regional myocardial blood flow measurement with SPECT.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Myocardial blood flow quantitation in patients with congestive heart failure: head-to-head comparison between rapid-rotating gantry SPECT and CZT SPECT.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The tools are ready, are we?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019
    Article
  15. Advances in imaging instrumentation for nuclear cardiology.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
  17. First validation of myocardial flow reserve assessed by dynamicEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2018
    Article
  18. Reporting myocardial flow reserve with PET. Ready or not, here it is! But walk before you fly!Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018
    Article
  19. New Trends in Quantitative Nuclear Cardiology Methods.Current cardiovascular imaging reports · 2018
    Article
  20. Avoiding full corrections in dynamic SPECT images impacts the performance of SPECT myocardial blood flow quantitation.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ran KleinUniversity of Ottawa Heart Institute, Cardiac PET Centre, 40 Ruskin St., Ottawa, ON, K1Y 4W7, Canada, rklein@ottawaheart.ca.
Guang-Uei Hung
Tao-Cheng Wu
Wen-Sheng Huang
Dianfu Li
Robert A deKemp
Bailing Hsu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMyocardial blood flow (MBF) quantification with dynamic SPECT could lead to widespread utilization of MBF imaging in clinical practice with little cost increase over current standard SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. This work evaluates the feasibility and operator-dependent variability of MBF and flow reserve measurements with (99m)Tc-sestamibi (MIBI) dynamic SPECT imaging using a standard dual-head SPECT camera.

methodsTwenty-eight patients underwent dipyridamole-stress and rest imaging with dynamic SPECT/CT acquisition. Quantitative images were iteratively reconstructed with all physical corrections and then myocardial and arterial blood regions of interest (ROI) were defined semi-automatically. A compartmental model was fitted to these ROI-sampled time-activity-curves, and flow-dependent MIBI extraction correction was applied to derive regional MBF values. Myocardial flow reserve (MFR) was estimated as stress/rest MBF ratio. MBF and MFR in low and high risk populations were evaluated for ability to detect disease. Images were each processed twice (≥7 days apart) by one expert and one novice operator to evaluate intra- and inter-operator variability of MBF and MFR measurement in the three coronary artery vascular territories.

resultsMean rest flow, stress flow, and MFR values were 0.83, 1.82 mL·minute(-1)·g(-1), and 2.45, respectively. For stress/rest MFR, the inter-operator reproducibility was r(2) = 0.86 with RPC = 1.1. Stress MBF and MFR were significantly reduced (P < .05) in high risk (n = 9) vs low risk populations (n = 19), indicating ability to detect disease. For expert and novice operators very good intra-operator correlations of r(2) = 0.98 and 0.95 (n = 168, P < .001) were observed for combined rest and stress regional flow values. Bland-Altman reproducibility coefficients (RPC) were 0.25 and 0.47 mL·minute(-1)·g(-1) for the expert and novice operators, respectively (P < .001). Inter-operator correlation was r(2) = 0.91 and Bland-Altman RPC = 0.58 mL·minute(-1)·g(-1) (n = 336).

conclusionsMBF and reserve measurements using (99m)Tc-sestamibi on a traditional, two-headed camera with fast rotation and with quantitative dynamic SPECT appears to be feasible, warranting further investigation.

Indexed as

Fractional Flow Reserve, MyocardialTechnetium Tc 99m SestamibiAgedCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary CirculationFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMaleMultimodal ImagingMyocardial Perfusion ImagingObserver VariationRadiopharmaceuticalsReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityRadiopharmaceuticalsTechnetium Tc 99m Sestamibi

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.