Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25280750›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical genetics2014

Clinical interpretation of CNVs with cross-species phenotype data.

Sebastian Köhler, Uwe Schoeneberg, Johanna Christina Czeschik, Sandra C Doelken, Jayne Y Hehir-Kwa, Jonas Ibn-Salem, Christopher J Mungall, Damian Smedley, Melissa A Haendel, Peter N Robinson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Prenatal phenotyping: A community effort to enhance the Human Phenotype Ontology.American journal of medical genetics. Part C, Seminars in medical genetics · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Human Phenotype Ontology in 2017.Nucleic acids research · 2017
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Disease insights through cross-species phenotype comparisons.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2015
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Sebastian Köhler *Institute for Medical Genetics and Human Genetics, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin,Berlin, Germany.
Uwe Schoeneberg *Foundation Institute Molecular Biology and Bioinformatics, Freie Universitaet Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Johanna Christina CzeschikInstitut für Humangenetik, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Sandra C DoelkenInstitute for Medical Genetics and Human Genetics, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin,Berlin, Germany.
Jayne Y Hehir-KwaDepartment of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Jonas Ibn-SalemInstitute for Medical Genetics and Human Genetics, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin,Berlin, Germany.
Christopher J MungallLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA.
Damian SmedleyThe Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, UK.
Melissa A HaendelDepartment of Medical Informatics and Epidemiology and OHSU Library, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, USA.
Peter N RobinsonInstitute for Medical Genetics and Human Genetics, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin,Berlin, Germany.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DELawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · USMax Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics · DEOregon Health & Science University · USRadboud University Medical Center · NLUniversity of Duisburg-Essen · DEWellcome Sanger Institute · GB

Funding

The Monarch Initiative: Linking Diseases to Model Organism ResourcesR24OD011883 · OD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HAENDEL, MELISSA A, MUNGALL, CHRISTOPHER J · 2012 to 2024
$16.0M
NIH HHS 5R24OD011883NIH HHS R24 OD011883
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical evaluation of CNVs identified via techniques such as array comparative genome hybridisation (aCGH) involves the inspection of lists of known and unknown duplications and deletions with the goal of distinguishing pathogenic from benign CNVs. A key step in this process is the comparison of the individual's phenotypic abnormalities with those associated with Mendelian disorders of the genes affected by the CNV. However, because often there is not much known about these human genes, an additional source of data that could be used is model organism phenotype data. Currently, almost 6000 genes in mouse and zebrafish are, when knocked out, associated with a phenotype in the model organism, but no disease is known to be caused by mutations in the human ortholog. Yet, searching model organism databases and comparing model organism phenotypes with patient phenotypes for identifying novel disease genes and medical evaluation of CNVs is hindered by the difficulty in integrating phenotype information across species and the lack of appropriate software tools.

methodsHere, we present an integrated ranking scheme based on phenotypic matching, degree of overlap with known benign or pathogenic CNVs and the haploinsufficiency score for the prioritisation of CNVs responsible for a patient's clinical findings.

resultsWe show that this scheme leads to significant improvements compared with rankings that do not exploit phenotypic information. We provide a software tool called PhenogramViz, which supports phenotype-driven interpretation of aCGH findings based on multiple data sources, including the integrated cross-species phenotype ontology Uberpheno, in order to visualise gene-to-phenotype relations.

conclusionsIntegrating and visualising cross-species phenotype information on the affected genes may help in routine diagnostics of CNVs.

Indexed as

PhenotypeAnimalsComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticDiseaseDNA Copy Number VariationsHumansMiceSpecies SpecificityZebrafishCopy number variationdata integrationhuman phenotype ontologymodel organism phenotypephenogram

Identifiers

PMID25280750
PMCPMC4501634
OpenAlexW2150417477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.