ArticleJournal of medical genetics2014
Clinical interpretation of CNVs with cross-species phenotype data.
Article in Journal of medical genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Computational resources associating diseases with genotypes, phenotypes and exposures.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2019Pooled it
- Prioritizing genomic variants through neuro-symbolic, knowledge-enhanced learning.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Inherited deletion of 9p22.3-p24.3 and duplication of 18p11.31-p11.32 associated with neurodevelopmental delay: Phenotypic matching of involved genes.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2023Article
- Prenatal phenotyping: A community effort to enhance the Human Phenotype Ontology.American journal of medical genetics. Part C, Seminars in medical genetics · 2022Article
- DeepSVP: integration of genotype and phenotype for structural variant prioritization using deep learning.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- Evaluating, Filtering and Clustering Genetic Disease Cohorts Based on Human Phenotype Ontology Data with Cohort Analyzer.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Article
- Model organism data evolving in support of translational medicine.Lab animal · 2018Review
- The anatomy of phenotype ontologies: principles, properties and applications.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2018Article
- Whole-exome sequencing identifies novel pathogenic mutations and putative phenotype-influencing variants in Polish limb-girdle muscular dystrophy patients.Human genomics · 2018Article
- Partial microduplication in the histone acetyltransferase complex member KANSL1 is associated with congenital heart defects in 22q11.2 microdeletion syndrome patients.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Whole genome sequencing of one complex pedigree illustrates challenges with genomic medicine.BMC medical genomics · 2017Article
- The Human Phenotype Ontology in 2017.Nucleic acids research · 2017Review
- A Whole-Genome Analysis Framework for Effective Identification of Pathogenic Regulatory Variants in Mendelian Disease.American journal of human genetics · 2016Article
- Genetic Variants in Isolated Ebstein Anomaly Implicated in Myocardial Development Pathways.PloS one · 2016Article
- Disease insights through cross-species phenotype comparisons.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2015Review
- Analysis of the human diseasome using phenotype similarity between common, genetic, and infectious diseases.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- PhenomeExpress: a refined network analysis of expression datasets by inclusion of known disease phenotypes.Scientific reports · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundClinical evaluation of CNVs identified via techniques such as array comparative genome hybridisation (aCGH) involves the inspection of lists of known and unknown duplications and deletions with the goal of distinguishing pathogenic from benign CNVs. A key step in this process is the comparison of the individual's phenotypic abnormalities with those associated with Mendelian disorders of the genes affected by the CNV. However, because often there is not much known about these human genes, an additional source of data that could be used is model organism phenotype data. Currently, almost 6000 genes in mouse and zebrafish are, when knocked out, associated with a phenotype in the model organism, but no disease is known to be caused by mutations in the human ortholog. Yet, searching model organism databases and comparing model organism phenotypes with patient phenotypes for identifying novel disease genes and medical evaluation of CNVs is hindered by the difficulty in integrating phenotype information across species and the lack of appropriate software tools.
methodsHere, we present an integrated ranking scheme based on phenotypic matching, degree of overlap with known benign or pathogenic CNVs and the haploinsufficiency score for the prioritisation of CNVs responsible for a patient's clinical findings.
resultsWe show that this scheme leads to significant improvements compared with rankings that do not exploit phenotypic information. We provide a software tool called PhenogramViz, which supports phenotype-driven interpretation of aCGH findings based on multiple data sources, including the integrated cross-species phenotype ontology Uberpheno, in order to visualise gene-to-phenotype relations.
conclusionsIntegrating and visualising cross-species phenotype information on the affected genes may help in routine diagnostics of CNVs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.