Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25280508›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2015

E2 potentializes benzo(a)pyrene-induced hepatic cytochrome P450 enzyme activities in Nile tilapia at high concentrations.

Aline Cristina Ferreira Rodrigues, Tatiana de Oliveira Moneró, Rosa Toyoko Shiraishi Frighetto, Eduardo Alves de Almeida

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Molecular and cellular effects of contamination in aquatic ecosystems.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Aline Cristina Ferreira RodriguesDepartamento de Química e Ciências Ambientais, IBILCE, UNESP, Av. Cristóvão Colombo 2265, 15054-000, São José do Rio Preto, SP, Brazil.
Tatiana de Oliveira MoneróDepartamento de Química e Ciências Ambientais, IBILCE, UNESP, Av. Cristóvão Colombo 2265, 15054-000, São José do Rio Preto, SP, Brazil.
Rosa Toyoko Shiraishi FrighettoEmbrapa Suínos e Aves, Br 153, Km 110, Caixa Postal 21, 89700-000, Concórdia, SC, Brazil.
Eduardo Alves de AlmeidaDepartamento de Química e Ciências Ambientais, IBILCE, UNESP, Av. Cristóvão Colombo 2265, 15054-000, São José do Rio Preto, SP, Brazil. ealmeida@ibilce.unesp.br.
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRConcordia University Wisconsin · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the aquatic environment, biotransformation enzymes are established biomarkers for assessing PAH exposure in fish, but little is known about the effect of 17β-estradiol (E2) on these enzymes during exposure to benzo(a)pyrene (BaP). In this study, Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) were exposed for 3, 5, and 10 days to BaP (300 μg L(-1)) and E2 (5 μg L(-1)). These substances were applied isolated or mixed. In the mixture experiment, fish were analyzed pre- and postexposure in order to better understand whether preexposure to the hormone masks the responses activated by PAH or vice versa. Phase I enzymes ethoxyresorufin-O-deethylase (EROD), pentoxyresorufin-O-depenthylase (PROD), and benzyloxyresorufin-O-debenzylase (BROD) activities as well as the phase II enzyme glutathione S-transferase (GST) were analyzed. Isolated E2 treatment decreased EROD activity after 3 days, but this enzyme activity returned to control values after 5 and 10 days of exposure. Isolated BaP treatment significantly induced EROD activity after 3 and 5 days, and the activity returned to control levels after ten exposure days. Combined treatment (E2 + Bap) significantly increased EROD activity, both in the pre- and postexposure. This increase was even higher than in the isolated BaP treatment, suggesting a synergism between these two compounds. When E2 and BaP were used singly, they did not change BROD and PROD activities. However, combined treatment (E2 + Bap) significantly increased PROD activity. Isolated BaP treatment increased GST activity after 10 days. However, this response was not observed in the mixture treatment, suggesting that E2 suppressed the GST induction modulated by BaP. The results put together indicated that E2 altered the biotransformation pathway regarding enzymes activated by BaP in Nile tilapia.

Indexed as

AnimalsBenzo(a)pyreneBiomarkersBiotransformationCichlidsDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug SynergismEstradiolLiverTime FactorsWater Pollutants, ChemicalBenzo(a)pyreneBiomarkersEstradiolWater Pollutants, Chemical17β-EstradiolBenzo(a)pyreneBiotransformation enzymesMixture of contaminantsOreochromis niloticus

Identifiers

PMID25280508
OpenAlexW1991451389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.