SynthesisBMC health services research2014
Exploring the relationship between governance mechanisms in healthcare and health workforce outcomes: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hospital accreditation: an umbrella review.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2023Pooled it
- Impact of clinical supervision on healthcare organisational outcomes: A mixed methods systematic review.PloS one · 2021Pooled it
- Governance and mental health: contributions for public policy approach.Revista de saude publica · 2017Pooled it
- Improving the governance of patient safety in emergency care: a systematic review of interventions.BMJ open · 2016Pooled it
- Mind the gap: governance mechanisms and health workforce outcomes.Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante · 2014Pooled it
- Personalised Psychological Care in Hospitals: An Organisational Model of Integrated, Patient- and Staff-Centred Services (2019-2024).Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
- Correlation Between Chinese Surgical Nurses' Perception of Holistic Humanistic Caring and Their Experience of Workplace Violence: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- The relationship between a friendly organizational environment and job performance in the post-pandemic era: an examination using career calling as a mediating variable.BMC psychology · 2025Article
- Unlocking the path to quality maternity care: a qualitative study on work environment dynamics, providers' responsiveness, and professionalism in central region, Malawi.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Ecuadorian healthcare professionals' perspectives on attributes of asthma care coordination: a qualitative study.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Workforce outcomes among substance use peer supports and their contextual determinants: A scoping review protocol.PloS one · 2024Article
- Workforce outcomes among substance use peer supports: a scoping review of individual and organizational influences.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- The Governance, Policy, Process, and Capacity of Health Workforce Regulation and Accreditation: Qualitative Policy Analysis and Evidence from Palestine.Journal of healthcare leadership · 2024Article
- Towards an Integrated Healthcare System: Evolutionary Game Analysis on Competition and Cooperation Between Urban and Rural Medical Institutions in China.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Governance in health workforce: how do we improve on the concept? A network-based, stakeholder-driven approach.Human resources for health · 2021Review
- Article
- Rethinking workforce planning for integrated care: using scenario analysis to facilitate policy development.BMC health services research · 2020Article
- Review of 128 quality of care mechanisms: A framework and mapping for health system stewards.Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2020Review
- The evolution of New Zealand's health workforce policy and planning system: a study of workforce governance and health reform.Human resources for health · 2019Article
- The barriers and facilitators to the implementation of National Clinical Programmes in Ireland: using the MRC framework for process evaluations.BMC health services research · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe objective of this systematic review of diverse evidence was to examine the relationship between health system governance and workforce outcomes. Particular attention was paid to how governance mechanisms facilitate change in the workforce to ensure the effective use of all health providers.
methodsIn accordance with standard systematic review procedures, the research team independently screened over 4300 abstracts found in database searches, website searches, and bibliographies. Searches were limited to 2001-2012, included only publications from Canada, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Australia, and the United States. Peer- reviewed papers and grey literature were considered. Two reviewers independently rated articles on quality and relevance and classified them into themes identified by the team. One hundred and thirteen articles that discussed both workforce and governance were retained and extracted into narrative summary tables for synthesis.
resultsSix types of governance mechanisms emerged from our analysis. Shared governance, Magnet accreditation, and professional development initiatives were all associated with improved outcomes for the health workforce (e.g., decreased turnover, increased job satisfaction, increased empowerment, etc.). Implementation of quality-focused initiatives was associated with apprehension among providers, but opportunities for provider training on these initiatives increased quality and improved work attitudes. Research on reorganization of healthcare delivery suggests that changing to team-based care is accompanied by stress and concerns about role clarity, that outcomes vary for providers in private versus public organizations, and that co-operative clinics are beneficial for physicians. Funding schemes required a supplementary search to achieve adequate depth and coverage. Those findings are reported elsewhere.
conclusionsThe results of the review show that while there are governance mechanisms that consider workforce impacts, it is not to the extent one might expect given the importance of the workforce for improving patient outcomes. Furthermore, to successfully implement governance mechanisms in this domain, there are key strategies recommended to support change and achieve desired outcomes. The most important of these are: to build trust by clearly articulating the organization's goal; considering the workforce through planning, implementation, and evaluation phases; and providing strong leadership.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.