Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25280445›Full record

Trial reportNeuroradiology2015

EVIDENCE trial: design of a phase 2, randomized, controlled, multicenter study comparing flow diversion and traditional endovascular strategy in unruptured saccular wide-necked intracranial aneurysms.

Francis Turjman, Olivier Levrier, Xavier Combaz, Alain Bonafé, Alessandra Biondi, Hubert Desal, Serge Bracard, Charbel Mounayer, Roberto Riva, Francois Chapuis and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neuroradiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01811134 (Multicenter Randomized Study for Medico-economic Evaluation of Embolization With Flow Diverter Stent in the Endovascular Treatment of Unruptured Saccular Wide-necked Intracranial Aneurysms), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01811134 nacompletednot on this map

Multicenter Randomized Study for Medico-economic Evaluation of Embolization With Flow Diverter Stent in the Endovascular Treatment of Unruptured Saccular Wide-necked Intracranial Aneurysms

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospices Civils de LyonRan2012 to 2020Enrolled91ConditionsIntracranial AneurysmArmsPIPELINE flow diverter stent, Coils, with or without expendable stent
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Thrombin-Fibrinogen In Vitro Flow Model of Thrombus Growth in Cerebral Aneurysms.TH open : companion journal to thrombosis and haemostasis · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Francis TurjmanDepartment of Interventional Neuroradiology, Hôpital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 59 Bd Pinel, 69677, Bron, France, francis.turjman@chu-lyon.fr.
Olivier Levrier
Xavier Combaz
Alain Bonafé
Alessandra Biondi
Hubert Desal
Serge Bracard
Charbel Mounayer
Roberto Riva
Francois Chapuis
Laure Huot
Xavier Armoiry
Benjamin Gory

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEndovascular treatment of large, wide-necked intracranial aneurysms with coils is associated with low rates of initial angiographic occlusion and high rates of recurrence. The Pipeline™ Embolization Device has shown high rates of complete occlusion in uncontrolled clinical series.

methodsThe study is a prospective, controlled, randomized, multicenter, phase 2 open-label trial. Intention-to-treat population includes age ≥18, unruptured saccular aneurysm located in the intra-dural area, neck diameter ≥4 and ≤10 mm, sac diameter ≥7 mm and ≤20 mm, "dome/neck" ratio is ≥1, diameter of the parent artery ≥2 mm and ≤5 mm, and no prior treatment of the aneurysm. Site can only participate if five patients have been previously treated with the Pipeline device. The primary end point of the study is complete occlusion of the aneurysm on angiogram performed 12 months after the endovascular procedure. Complete aneurysm occlusion is defined as the absence of visible blood flow, grade 1 according to the Raymond scale for the standard procedure group and grade 4 according to the grading scale of Kamran for the flow diverter group.

resultsThe trial is currently enrolling and results of the data are pending the completion of enrollment and follow-up.

conclusionThis paper details the trial design of the French EVIDENCE phase 2 trial, a blinded, controlled randomized trial of wide-neck intra-dural aneurysms amenable to either traditional endovascular strategy or flow diversion with Pipeline device.

Indexed as

NeuroimagingResearch DesignAdultAgedEndovascular ProceduresFemaleFranceHumansIntracranial AneurysmMaleMiddle AgedProspective Studies

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.