Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25280443›Full record

ArticleGastroenterology2015

Association between molecular subtypes of colorectal cancer and patient survival.

Amanda I Phipps, Paul J Limburg, John A Baron, Andrea N Burnett-Hartman, Daniel J Weisenberger, Peter W Laird, Frank A Sinicrope, Christophe Rosty, Daniel D Buchanan, John D Potter and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gastroenterology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02781337 (Epidemiological and Molecular Colorectal Cancer Registry), which is not on this map. Cited by 227 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
227citing papers in PubMed
31.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02781337 recruitingnot on this map

Epidemiological and Molecular Colorectal Cancer Registry

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorHospital Italiano de Buenos AiresRan2012 to 2033Enrolled2,100ConditionsColorectal Neoplasms, Colorectal Cancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

227 citing papers in PubMed, 403 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Significance of Th1 and Th2 Cell Densities and Th1/Th2 Cytokine Profiles in Colorectal Cancer.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025
    Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Highly Sensitive DNA Testing of Fusobacterium nucleatum in Colorectal Tumors.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Waist Circumference, a Body Shape Index, and Molecular Subtypes of Colorectal Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of Four Cohort Studies.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

167 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Amanda I PhippsEpidemiology Department, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington. Electronic address: aiphipps@u.washington.edu.
Paul J LimburgDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
John A BaronDepartment of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Andrea N Burnett-HartmanEpidemiology Department, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
Daniel J WeisenbergerUSC Epigenome Center, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Peter W LairdUSC Epigenome Center, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Frank A SinicropeDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Christophe RostyCancer and Population Studies Group, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Herston, QLD, Australia; Department of Molecular and Cellular Pathology, University of Queensland School of Medicine, Herston, QLD, Australia.
Daniel D BuchananCancer and Population Studies Group, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Herston, QLD, Australia.
John D PotterEpidemiology Department, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington; Centre for Public Health Research, Massey University, Wellington, New Zealand.
Polly A NewcombEpidemiology Department, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
Fred Hutch Cancer Center · USQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute · AUUniversity of Southern California · USWinnMed · USMassey University · NZUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

SEATTLE FAMILIAL COLORECTAL CANCER REGISTRYU01CA074794 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI NEWCOMB, POLLY A · 1997 to 2007
$14.1M
Institute of Translational Health SciencesKL2TR000421 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DISIS, MARY L. · 2012 to 2016
$12.6M
Colon Cancer Family Registry CohortUM1CA167551 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HAILE, ROBERT WILLIAM, JENKINS, MARK A · 2013 to 2017
$11.3M
The Colon Cancer Family Registry: SeattleU24CA074794 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI NEWCOMB, POLLY A · 2008 to 2011
$7.0M
CpG Island Methylator Phenotype in Human Colorectal CancerR01CA118699 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI LAIRD, PETER W · 2007 to 2011
$2.5M
Hormones and Colon Cancer: Epigenetic Subtypes, Risk, and SurvivalR01CA076366 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI NEWCOMB, POLLY A · 1998 to 2009
$2.4M
Molecular Epidemiology of Colorectal Cancer SubtypesR01CA107333 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI LIMBURG, PAUL J · 2005 to 2010
$1.4M
Training and Research in Colon Cancer SurvivalK05CA152715 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI NEWCOMB, POLLY A · 2010 to 2019
$991k
Translational Research in Colon Cancer Prevention & TreatmentK05CA142885 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI SINICROPE, FRANK A. · 2009 to 2013
$808k
Lifestyle Factors and Survival Outcomes for Colorectal Cancer Molecular SubtypesK07CA172298 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI PHIPPS, AMANDA IRENE · 2013 to 2016
$406k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000421NCATS NIH HHS KL2TR000421NCI NIH HHS K05 CA142885NCI NIH HHS K05CA142885NCI NIH HHS K05 CA152715NCI NIH HHS K07 CA172298NCI NIH HHS K07CA172298NCI NIH HHS R01 CA076366NCI NIH HHS R01CA076366NCI NIH HHS R01 CA107333NCI NIH HHS R01CA107333NCI NIH HHS R01 CA118699NCI NIH HHS R01CA118699NCI NIH HHS U01 CA074794NCI NIH HHS U01CA74794NCI NIH HHS U24 CA074794NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA167551
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsColorectal cancer (CRC) is a heterogeneous disease that can develop via several pathways. Different CRC subtypes, identified based on tumor markers, have been proposed to reflect these pathways. We evaluated the significance of these previously proposed classifications to survival.

methodsParticipants in the population-based Seattle Colon Cancer Family Registry were diagnosed with invasive CRC from 1998 through 2007 in western Washington State (N = 2706), and followed for survival through 2012. Tumor samples were collected from 2050 participants and classified into 5 subtypes based on combinations of tumor markers: type 1 (microsatellite instability [MSI]-high, CpG island methylator phenotype [CIMP] -positive, positive for BRAF mutation, negative for KRAS mutation); type 2 (microsatellite stable [MSS] or MSI-low, CIMP-positive, positive for BRAF mutation, negative for KRAS mutation); type 3 (MSS or MSI low, non-CIMP, negative for BRAF mutation, positive for KRAS mutation); type 4 (MSS or MSI-low, non-CIMP, negative for mutations in BRAF and KRAS); and type 5 (MSI-high, non-CIMP, negative for mutations in BRAF and KRAS). Multiple imputation was used to impute tumor markers for those missing data on 1-3 markers. We used Cox regression to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for associations of subtypes with disease-specific and overall mortality, adjusting for age, sex, body mass, diagnosis year, and smoking history.

resultsCompared with participants with type 4 tumors (the most predominant), participants with type 2 tumors had the highest disease-specific mortality (HR = 2.20, 95% CI: 1.47-3.31); subjects with type 3 tumors also had higher disease-specific mortality (HR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.07-1.63). Subjects with type 5 tumors had the lowest disease-specific mortality (HR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.14-0.66). Associations with overall mortality were similar to those with disease-specific mortality.

conclusionsBased on a large, population-based study, CRC subtypes, defined by proposed etiologic pathways, are associated with marked differences in survival. These findings indicate the clinical importance of studies into the molecular heterogeneity of CRC.

Indexed as

CpG IslandsDNA MethylationMicrosatellite InstabilityAdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalDNA Mutational AnalysisFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedMutationBiomarkers, TumorBRAF protein, humanKRAS protein, humanProto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)ras ProteinsMethylationOncogenePrognostic FactorSerrated Colorectal Cancer

Identifiers

PMID25280443
PMCPMC4274235
OpenAlexW2069443403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.