Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25280181›Full record

ArticleJournal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association2015

Sources of vitamin D and calcium in the diets of preschool children in the UK and the theoretical effect of food fortification.

V L Cribb, K Northstone, D Hopkins, P M Emmett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Sources of vitamin D and calcium in the diets of preschool children in the UK and the theoretical effect of food fortification.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2015
    Article
  11. Life-course approach to nutrition.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2015
    Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

V L CribbCentre for Child and Adolescent Health, School for Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
K NorthstoneSchool for Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
D HopkinsNutrition and Dietetic Department, Southampton General Hospital, Hampshire, UK.
P M EmmettCentre for Child and Adolescent Health, School for Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council 74882Medical Research Council MC_PC_15018Wellcome Trust 092731Wellcome Trust 102215
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDietary intakes of vitamin D are very low in the UK. Dietary calcium is also necessary to promote bone health. The fortification of foods with vitamin D could be a safe and effective way of increasing intake.

methodsDiets of preschool children, 755 at 18 months and 3.5 years, from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children were assessed using dietary records completed by parents. Energy, vitamin D and calcium intakes were calculated. Multinomial logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratio for being in the highest/lowest quartile of intake. Intakes were recalculated to test different fortification regimes.

resultsVitamin D intakes were low; all children were below the UK and US dietary recommendations. Calcium intakes decreased between the two ages as a result of reduced milk consumption. Children in the lowest quartile for vitamin D intake at 18 months were twice as likely to remain in that quartile at 3.5 years (odds ratio = 2.35; 95% confidence interval = 1.56-3.55). The majority of foods provide no vitamin D with fat spreads and milk as the main sources. The contribution from breakfast cereals increased, from 6% to 12%, as a result of the increased consumption of fortified cereals. Dairy foods provided the highest contribution to calcium at 18 months but were less important at 3.5 years. Theoretical intakes from different fortification regimens suggest that milk fortified at 2 μg 100 g(-1) vitamin D would provide most children with adequate but not excessive intakes.

conclusionsDietary vitamin D intakes were very low and calcium intakes were mostly adequate. Fortification of milk with vitamin D could be a good way to boost intakes.

Indexed as

Calcium, DietaryChild Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesDietDiet RecordsFemaleFood, FortifiedHumansInfantLongitudinal StudiesMaleNutrition SurveysUnited KingdomVitamin DCalcium, DietaryVitamin DAvon longitudinal study of parents and childrencalciumdietary intakesfood fortificationpreschool childrenvitamin D

Identifiers

PMID25280181
PMCPMC4780273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.