Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25279763›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Releasing dentate nucleus cells from Purkinje cell inhibition generates output from the cerebrocerebellum.

Takahiro Ishikawa, Saeka Tomatsu, Yoshiaki Tsunoda, Jongho Lee, Donna S Hoffman, Shinji Kakei

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Consensus Paper: Models of Cerebellar Functions.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026
    Review
  6. Comparison of Signals from Cerebellar Purkinje Cells and Deep Nuclei during Temporal Prediction in Primates.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Control of tongue movements by the Purkinje cells of the cerebellum.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. The olivary input to the cerebellum dissociates sensory events from movement plans.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Synchronous spiking of cerebellar Purkinje cells during control of movements.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Takahiro IshikawaMotor Disorders Project, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Setagaya, Tokyo, Japan.
Saeka TomatsuDepartment of Neurophysiology, National Institute of Neuroscience, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Kodaira, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshiaki TsunodaFrontal Lobe Function Project, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Setagaya, Tokyo, Japan.
Jongho LeeMotor Disorders Project, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Setagaya, Tokyo, Japan.
Donna S HoffmanDepartment of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Shinji KakeiMotor Disorders Project, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Setagaya, Tokyo, Japan.
Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science · JPCenter for the Neural Basis of Cognition · USNational Center of Neurology and Psychiatry · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cerebellum generates its vast amount of output to the cerebral cortex through the dentate nucleus (DN) that is essential for precise limb movements in primates. Nuclear cells in DN generate burst activity prior to limb movement, and inactivation of DN results in cerebellar ataxia. The question is how DN cells become active under intensive inhibitory drive from Purkinje cells (PCs). There are two excitatory inputs to DN, mossy fiber and climbing fiber collaterals, but neither of them appears to have sufficient strength for generation of burst activity in DN. Therefore, we can assume two possible mechanisms: post-inhibitory rebound excitation and disinhibition. If rebound excitation works, phasic excitation of PCs and a concomitant inhibition of DN cells should precede the excitation of DN cells. On the other hand, if disinhibition plays a primary role, phasic suppression of PCs and activation of DN cells should be observed at the same timing. To examine these two hypotheses, we compared the activity patterns of PCs in the cerebrocerebellum and DN cells during step-tracking wrist movements in three Japanese monkeys. As a result, we found that the majority of wrist-movement-related PCs were suppressed prior to movement onset and the majority of wrist-movement-related DN cells showed concurrent burst activity without prior suppression. In a minority of PCs and DN cells, movement-related increases and decreases in activity, respectively, developed later. These activity patterns suggest that the initial burst activity in DN cells is generated by reduced inhibition from PCs, i.e., by disinhibition. Our results indicate that suppression of PCs, which has been considered secondary to facilitation, plays the primary role in generating outputs from DN. Our findings provide a new perspective on the mechanisms used by PCs to influence limb motor control and on the plastic changes that underlie motor learning in the cerebrocerebellum.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsCerebellar CortexCerebellar NucleiCerebellumMacacaMovementNeural InhibitionPurkinje Cells

Identifiers

PMID25279763
PMCPMC4184834
OpenAlexW1993071559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.