ArticleSpringerPlus2014
Methylphenidate off-label use and safety.
Article in SpringerPlus, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical characteristics and outcomes of pediatric methylphenidate intoxication: a five-year single-center study.BMC pharmacology & toxicology · 2026Article
- Distinct Swimming Behavioral Phenotypes Following Serotonin and Dopamine Transporter Modulation in the Adult Zebrafish Novel Tank Diving Test (NTT).Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Current insights into the safety and adverse effects of methylphenidate in children, adolescents, and adults - narrative review.Pharmacological reports : PR · 2025Review
- Pathogenesis-directed therapy of methylphenidate-induced oxidative heart damage in rats.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Arousal dysregulation and executive dysfunction in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Article
- Exploring the use of cognitive enhancement substances among Portuguese university students.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2022Article
- Use and misuse of prescription stimulants by university students: a cross-sectional survey in the french-speaking community of Belgium, 2018.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2022Article
- Off-Label Medication: From a Simple Concept to Complex Practical Aspects.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Review
- Overuse of methylphenidate: an analysis of Swedish pharmacy dispensing data.Clinical epidemiology · 2018Article
- Smart drugs: implications for general practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2017Article
- Methylphenidate dose optimization for ADHD treatment: review of safety, efficacy, and clinical necessity.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2017Review
- Psychostimulants and movement disorders.Frontiers in neurology · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMethylphenidate is a piperidine derivative structurally and pharmacologically similar to amphetamine. Methylphenidate is indicated for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in children aged 6 years of age and over when remedial measures alone prove insufficient. In adults, its indication, except in narcolepsy, is not defined. Methylphenidate received regulatory approval almost sixty years ago with a first registration in Switzerland in October 1954.
objectiveTo evaluate the off-label use of methylphenidate and its characteristics from a database of spontaneous reports.
methodsThis study analysed data from the French Pharmacovigilance Database of adverse drug reactions spontaneously reported by health professionals from 1985 to December 2011. Off-label use was evaluated according to age.
resultsIn the French Pharmacovigilance database, 181 cases of adverse drug reactions were reported with methylphenidate. Neuropsychiatric effects were the most frequent adverse event reported (41%) followed by cardiovascular and cutaneous side effects (14%). 143 reports concerned children (113 boys, 30 girls, mean age 10.6 ± 3.3 years) of which 46 (30%) were off-label uses. There were 38 adults (20 men, 18 women), of which 32 (88%) off-label use. In adults, methylphenidate was prescribed for depression, and this practice was associated with serious adverse events of drug dependence, overdose and suicide attempt. Overall, off-label use was detected in 43% (78/181) of all cases reported.
conclusionMore than 40% of the patients with drug reactions received methylphenidate for off-label indications. Additional long-term exposures and independent clinical studies are necessary to establish the long-term profile safety of methylphenidate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.