Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25279275›Full record

ArticleSpringerPlus2014

Methylphenidate off-label use and safety.

Thierry Trenque, Emmanuelle Herlem, Malak Abou Taam, Moustapha Drame

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SpringerPlus, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Off-Label Medication: From a Simple Concept to Complex Practical Aspects.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Smart drugs: implications for general practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2017
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Psychostimulants and movement disorders.Frontiers in neurology · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Thierry TrenqueRegional Centre for Pharmacovigilance and Pharmacoepidemiology, Reims University Hospitals, Avenue du General Koenig, 51092, Reims, France ; Faculty of Medicine, University of Reims Champagne-Ardenne, EA 3797, F-51095 Reims, France.
Emmanuelle HerlemRegional Centre for Pharmacovigilance and Pharmacoepidemiology, Reims University Hospitals, Avenue du General Koenig, 51092, Reims, France.
Malak Abou TaamRegional Centre for Pharmacovigilance and Pharmacoepidemiology, Reims University Hospitals, Avenue du General Koenig, 51092, Reims, France.
Moustapha DrameFaculty of Medicine, University of Reims Champagne-Ardenne, EA 3797, F-51095 Reims, France ; Department of Research and Innovations, Reims University Hospitals, Avenue du General Koenig, 51092 Reims, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMethylphenidate is a piperidine derivative structurally and pharmacologically similar to amphetamine. Methylphenidate is indicated for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in children aged 6 years of age and over when remedial measures alone prove insufficient. In adults, its indication, except in narcolepsy, is not defined. Methylphenidate received regulatory approval almost sixty years ago with a first registration in Switzerland in October 1954.

objectiveTo evaluate the off-label use of methylphenidate and its characteristics from a database of spontaneous reports.

methodsThis study analysed data from the French Pharmacovigilance Database of adverse drug reactions spontaneously reported by health professionals from 1985 to December 2011. Off-label use was evaluated according to age.

resultsIn the French Pharmacovigilance database, 181 cases of adverse drug reactions were reported with methylphenidate. Neuropsychiatric effects were the most frequent adverse event reported (41%) followed by cardiovascular and cutaneous side effects (14%). 143 reports concerned children (113 boys, 30 girls, mean age 10.6 ± 3.3 years) of which 46 (30%) were off-label uses. There were 38 adults (20 men, 18 women), of which 32 (88%) off-label use. In adults, methylphenidate was prescribed for depression, and this practice was associated with serious adverse events of drug dependence, overdose and suicide attempt. Overall, off-label use was detected in 43% (78/181) of all cases reported.

conclusionMore than 40% of the patients with drug reactions received methylphenidate for off-label indications. Additional long-term exposures and independent clinical studies are necessary to establish the long-term profile safety of methylphenidate.

Indexed as

MethylphenidateOff-label use

Identifiers

PMID25279275
PMCPMC4162523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.